TY - JOUR AU - Bruno Cassara PY - 2020/12/16 Y2 - 2024/03/29 TI - A-Priority and Hermeneutics: The Scientificity of Phenomenology from Husserl to Heidegger JF - Bollettino Filosofico JA - BolFilos VL - 35 IS - 0 SE - Focus DO - 10.6093/1593-7178/7438 UR - http://www.serena.unina.it/index.php/bolfilos/article/view/7438 AB - Like Husserl, the young Heidegger was preoccupied with the a-priority of phenomenology. He also incorporates hermeneutics into phenomenology, though Husserl was convinced that the a-priority of phenomenology removed all interpretation from its analyses. This paper investigates how the early Heidegger is able to make hermeneutics a general condition of understanding while maintaining, in line with Husserl, that phenomenology is an a-priori science. This paper also provides insight into key debates in the history of phenomenology. I examine two places in which Heidegger departs from Husserl’s phenomenology – the doctrine of categorial intuition and the “as-structure” of understanding – to show that a-priority and hermeneutic understanding come together, ontically, in facticity as the only possible starting point for phenomenology. Ontologically, however, a-priority and hermeneutics come together in the co-affection of Dasein as understanding and being as pre-given. This co-affection is itself dependent on Temporality as “the condition of any possible earlier”.Keywords: Apriori, Heidegger, Hermeneutics, Husserl, Idea of Science  ER -