Laparoscopic Central Pancreatectomy and Pancreaticogastrostomy for the Management of a Proximally Migrated Pancreatic Stent
Context Pancreatic stents are used for both benign and malignant pancreatic disease but can be associated with complications such as proximal migration. Case report A 43-year-old female with benign biliary disease underwent prophylactic pancreatic stent placement after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. This stent migrated proximally into the pancreatic duct and could not be retrieved by endoscopic measures. Therefore, she underwent surgical retrieval via a laparoscopic central pancreatectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction. The procedure took 250 minutes with minimal blood loss. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged on the sixth postoperative day without any evidence of pancreatic fistula. Conclusion Laparoscopic central pancreatectomy is a feasible option for the unusual indication of a retained proximally migrated pancreatic duct stent.
Image: Pancreatic ductotomy with exposure of the impacted 5 Fr pigtail pancreatic duct stent.
Price LH, Brandabur JJ, Kozarek RA, Gluck M, Traverso WL, Irani S. Good stents gone bad: Endoscopic treatment of proximally migrated pancreatic duct stents. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 70(1):174-9. [PMID: 19559842].
Choudhary A, Bechtold ML, Arif M, Szary NM, Puli SR, Othman MO, et al. Pancreatic stents for prophylaxis against post-ERCP pancreatitis: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 73(2):275-82. [PMID: 21295641].
Johanson JF., Achmalz MJ. Geenen JE. Incidence and risk factors for biliary and pancreatic stent migration. Gastrointest Endosc. 1992; 38:341-346. [PMID: 1607087].
Gong B, Sun B, Hao LX, Bie L. Usefulness of an algorithm for endoscopic retrieval of proximally migrated 5Fr and 7Fr pancreatic stents. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2011; 10(2):196-200. [PMID: 21459728].
Lucas D, Glaser J, Pearl J. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for retrieval of a proximally migrated pancreatic stent. JSLS 2012; 16:169-172. [PMID: 22906350].
Lahoti S, Catalano MF, Geenen JE, Schmalz. Endoscopic retrieval of proximally migrated biliary and opancreatic stents: experience of a large referal center. Gastrointest Endosc 1998:50:124-5. [PMID: 9647373].
Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA. Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: Overall outcomes and severity of complications using the accordion severity grading system. J Am Coll Surg. 2012; 215(6):810-9. [PMID: 22999327].
Dagradi ASG: Pancreatectomia Intermedia. Enciclopedia Medica Italiana. Firenze, USES Edizioni Scientifiche, 1984, vol XI, pp 850–851.
Roggin KK, Rudloff U, Blumgart LH, Brennan MF. Central pancreatectomy revisited. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10(6):804-12. [PMID: 16769536].
DiNorcia J, Ahmed L, Lee MK, Reavey PL, Yakaitis EA, Lee JA, et al. Better preservation of endocrine function after central versus distal pancreatectomy for mid-gland lesions. Surgery. 2010; 148(6):1247-54; discussion 1254-6. [PMID: 21134558].
Winer J, Can MF, Bartlett DL, Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH. The current state of robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 9(8):468-76. [PMID: 22733352].
Venara A, de Franco V, Mucci S, Frampas E, Lermite E, Regenet N, Hamy A. Central pancreatectomy: comparison of results according to the type of anastomosis. J Visc Surg. 2012;149(2):e153-8. [PMID: 22317930].
Wente MN, Shrikhande SV, Müller MW, Diener MK, Seiler CM, Friess H, Büchler MW. Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2007;193(2):171-83. [PMID: 17236843].
Copyright (c) 2014 Felipe Gonzalez, Marc G Mesleh, Frank J Lukens, Michael B Wallace, Horacio J Asbun, John Andrew Stauffer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.As a member of Publisher International Linking Association, PILA, iMedPub Group’s JOP follows the Creative Commons Attribution License and Scholars Open Access publishing policies. Journal of the Pancreas is the Council Contributor Member of Council of Science Editors (CSE) and following the CSE slogan Education, Ethics, and Evidence for Editors.