Cyst Fluid Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level Is not Predictive of Invasive Cancer in Patients with Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm of the Pancreas
Abstract
Context Cyst fluid CEA concentration >192ng/mL has proven accurate to differentiate mucinous from non-mucinous pancreatic cystic neoplasms. It is unclear whether the degree of cyst fluid CEA elevation is predictive of malignant behavior in IPMNs. Objectives To determine whether elevated cyst fluid CEA concentrations were predictive of invasive cancer. Design Cross sectional study. Setting Single National Cancer Institute comprehensive cancer care center experience. Patients Forty-seven patients underwent preoperative EUS-FNA with cyst fluid analysis and surgical resection of an IPMN over a 9 year period. Main outcome measurements Cyst fluid CEA concentrations among the four grades associated with IPMN (low grade dysplasia, moderate dysplasia, high grade dysplasia, and invasive cancer). Results The mean±standard deviation cyst fluid CEA concentration increased as the pathology progressed from low grade dysplasia (1,261±1,679 ng/mL) to moderate dysplasia (7,171±22,210 ng/mL) to high grade dysplasia (10,807±36,203 ng/mL). However, the mean CEA level decreased (462±631 ng/mL) once invasive cancer developed (P=0.869). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of a cyst fluid CEA concentration greater than 200 ng/mL for the diagnosis of malignant IPMN (cases of high grade dysplasia and invasive IPMN) was 52.4%, 42.3%, 42.3%, 52.4% and 46.8%, respectively. Limitations Single center experience, small patient numbers, retrospective data collection. Conclusion The degree of cyst fluid CEA elevation is a poor predictor of malignant degeneration within IPMNs. Clinical management decisions regarding surgical resection should not be based upon degree of cyst fluid CEA elevation.
Image: Box-plot comparing pre-operative CEA levels with surgical pathology.
Downloads
References
Zhang XM, Mitchell DG, Dohke M, et al. Pancreatic cysts: Depiction on single-shot fast spin-echo MR images. Radiology 2002;223:547-53.
Kimura W, Nagai H, Kuroda A, et al. Analysis of small cystic lesions of the pancreas. Int J Pancreatol 1995;18:197-206.
Lee KS, Sekhar A, Rofsky NM, et al. Pevalence of incidental pancreatic cysts in adult population on MR imaging. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:2079-2084
De Jong K, Nio CY, Hermans JJ, et al. High prevalence of pancreatic cysts detected by screening magnetic resonance imaging examinations. ClinGastroenterolHepatol 2010;8:806-811.
Laffan TA, Horton KM, Klein AP, et al. Prevalence of unsuspected pancreatic cysts on MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:802-807.
Brugge WR, Lewandrowski K, Lee-Lewandrowski, et al. Diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: A report from the Cooperative Pancreatic Cyst Study. Gastroenterology 2004;126:1330-1336.
O’Toole D, Palazzo L, Hammel P, et al. Macrocystic pancreatic cystadenoma: The role of EUSand cyst fluid analysis in distinguishing mucinous and serous lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;59:823-9.
Frossard JL, Amouyal P, Amouyal G, et al. Performance of endosonography-guided fine needle aspiration and biopsy in the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:1516-24.
van der Waaij LA, van Dullemen HM, Porte RJ. Cyst fluid analysis in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions: A pooled analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;62:383-9.
Shami VM, Sundaram V, Stelow EB, et al. The level of carcinoembryonic antigen and the presence of mucin as predictors of cystic pancreatic mucinous neoplasia. Pancreas 2007;34:466-9.
LeBorgne J, de Calan I, Partensky C. Cystadenomas and cystadenocarcinomas of the pancreas: A multi-institutional retrospective study of 398 cases. French Surgical Association. Ann Surgery 1999;230:152-161.
Johnson CD, Stephens DH, Charboneau JW, et al. Cystic pancreatic tumors: CT and sonographic assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988:151:1133-1138.
CurryCA, Eng J, Horton KM, et al. CT of primary cystic pancreatic neoplasms: Can CT be used for patient triage and treatment? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:11-103.
Cohen-Scali F, Vilgrain V, Brancatelli G, et al. Discrimination of unilocular macrocystic serous cystadenoma from pancreatic pseudocyst and mucinous cystadenoma with CT: Initial observations. Radiology 2003;228:727-33.
Gerke H, Jaffe TA, Mitchell RM, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound and CT are inaccurate methods of classifying cystic pancreatic lesions. Dig Liver Dis 2006;38:39-44.
Tanaka M, Chari S, Adsay V, et al. International consensus guidelines for management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. Pancreatology 2006;6:17-32.
Salvia R, Crippa S, Falconi M, et al. Branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: to operate or not to operate? Results of a prospective protocol on the management of 109 consecutive patients. Gut 2007;56:1086-90.
Tanaka M. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: Diagnosis and treatment. Pancreas 2004;28:282-8.
Oh HC, Kim MH, Hwang CY, et al. Cystic lesions of the pancreas: Challenging issues in clinical practice. Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103:229-39.
Al-Haddad M, Schmidt MC, Sandrasegaran K, DeWitt J. Diagnosis and treatment of cystic pancreatic tumors. ClinGastroenterol and Hepatol 2011;9:635-48.
MaireF, Voitot H, Aubert A, et al. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: Performance of pancreatic fluid analysis for positive diagnosis and prediction of malignancy. Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103:2871-2877.
Correa-Gallego C, Warshaw AL, Fernandez del-Castillo C. Fluid CEA in IPMNs: a useful test or flip of a coin? Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:796-97.
Gress FG, Hawes RH, Savides TJ, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy using linear array and radial scanning endosonography. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;62:383-9.
Roesch T. Endoscopic ultrasonography equipment and technique. Gastrointest Endoscopy Clin N Am 2005;15:13-31.
Brugge WR. The role of EUS in diagnosis of cystic lesions of the pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;52:S18-S22.
Gray-Owen SD and Blumberg RS. CEACAM1: contact-dependent control of immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 2006;6:433-46.
Tobioka H, Isomura H, Kokai Y, et al. Polarized distribution of carcinoembryonic antigen is associated with a tight junction molecule in human colorectal adenocarcinoma. J Pathol 2002; 198(2):207-12.
Pakdel A, Naghibalhossaini F, Mokarram P, et al. Regulation of carcinoembryonic antigen release from colorectal cancer cells. MolBiol Rep 2011 Jul 2. [Epub ahead of print].
Copyright (c) 2014 Stephen Kucera, Barbara A Centeno, Gregory Springett, Mokenge P Malafa, Yian Ann Chen, Jill Weber, Jason Klapman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As a member of Publisher International Linking Association, PILA, iMedPub Group’s JOP follows the Creative Commons Attribution License and Scholars Open Access publishing policies. Journal of the Pancreas is the Council Contributor Member of Council of Science Editors (CSE) and following the CSE slogan Education, Ethics, and Evidence for Editors.