Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. Looking Beyond Traditional Chemotherapy and Radiation

  • Guy Savir Tufts Medical Center. Boston, MA, USA
  • Kathryn E Huber Tufts Medical Center. Boston, MA, USA
  • Muhammad Wasif Saif Tufts Medical Center. Boston, MA, USA
Keywords: Chemoradiation, Immunotherapy, Neoadjuvant Therapy

Abstract

About a third of all pancreatic cancer is found to be locally advanced at the time of diagnosis, where the tumor is inoperable but remains localized to the pancreas and regional lymphatics. Sadly, this remains a universally deadly disease with progression to distant disease being the predominant mode of failure and average survival under one year. Optimal treatment of these patients continues to be an area of controversy, with chemotherapy alone being the treatment preference in Europe, and chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation in selected patients, preferred in the USA. The aim of this paper is to summarize the key abstracts presented at the 2013 ASCO Annual Meeting that address evolving approaches to the management of locally advanced pancreatic cancer. The late breaking abstract (#LBA4003) provided additional European data showing non-superiority of chemoradiation compared to chemotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients without distant progression following 4 months of chemotherapy. Another late breaking abstract, (#LBA4004), unfortunately showed a promising new complement to gemcitabine and capecitabine using immunotherapy in the form of a T-helper vaccine did not translate to improved survival in the phase III setting.

Image: Tufts University Medford/Somerville campus. Medford, MA, USA.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Kathryn E Huber, Tufts Medical Center. Boston, MA, USA
Radiation Oncology, Assistant Professor

References

Hidalgo M. Pancreatic cancer. N Eng J Med 2010; 362:1605-17.

Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Fu B, Yachida S et al. DPC4 gene status of the primary carcinoma correlates with patterns of failure in patients with pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 1806–1813.

Moertel CG. Therapy of locally unresectable pancreatic carcinoma: a randomized comparison of high dose (6000 rads) radiation alone, moderate dose radiation (4000 rads + 5-fluorouracil), and high dose radiation + 5-fluorouracil: The Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group. Cancer. 1981 Oct 15;48(8):1705-10.

Treatment of locally unresectable carcinoma of the pancreas: comparison of combined-modality therapy (chemotherapy plus radiotherapy) to chemotherapy alone. Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group. J Natl Cancer Inst 1988;80(10):751-755.

Cohen SJ, et al. A randomized phase III study of radiotherapy alone or with 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin-c in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study E8282. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;62(5): 1345-1350.

Klassen DJ, et al. Treatment of locally unresectable cancer of the stomach and pancreas: a randomized comparison of 5-fluorouracil alone with radiation plus concurrent and maintenance 5-fluorouracil-an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 1985;3(3):373-378.

Burris HA III, Moore MJ, Anderson J, et al: Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: A randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 15:2403-2413, 1997.

Chauffert B, et al. Phase III trial comparing intensive induction chemoradiotherapy (60Gy, infusional 5-FU and intermittent cisplatin) followed by maintenance gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer. Definitive results of the 2000-01 FFCD/SFRO study. Ann Oncol 2008;19(9):1592-1599.

Loehrer Pj Sr. Gemcitabine alone versus gemcitabine plus radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Nov 1;29(31):4105-12.

Li CP, et al. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer: gemcitabine versus 5-fluorouracil, a randomized controlled study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003;57(1):98-104.

Mukherjee S. Gemcitabine-based or capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (SCALOP): a multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Apr;14(4):317-26.

Hammel, et al. Comparison of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and chemotherapy (CT) in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) controlled after 4 months of gemcitabine with or without erlotinib: Final results of the international phase III LAP 07 study. J Clin Oncol 31,2013 (suppl; abstr #LBA4003)

Middleton G W, et al. A phase III randomized trial of chemoimmunotherapy comprising gemcitabine and capecitabine with or without telomerase vaccine GV 1001 in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl; abstr #LBA4004).

Tufts University Medford/Somerville campus. Medford, MA, USA
Published
2013-07-10
How to Cite
SavirG., HuberK., & SaifM. (2013). Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. Looking Beyond Traditional Chemotherapy and Radiation. JOP. Journal of the Pancreas, 14(4), 337-339. https://doi.org/10.6092/1590-8577/1677
Section
Highlights from the “2013 ASCO Annual Meeting”. Chicago, IL, USA. May 31 - June 4, 2013

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>