Urban planning for biodiversity
An assessment of green plans in Northern Italy
Abstract
In the latest debate on the urban planning-biodiversity nexus, a forefront attention is given to the possibility to embrace goals, targets, and indicators from the global, European, and national levels and to apply them at the local scale through targeted policies and specific actions. This article proposes an attempt to identify a theoretical framework for the integration of biodiversity in spatial planning processes at different scales, through mainstreaming ecological transition, rightsizing the strategies and policies for biodiversity recovering, and downscaling the different challenges in the local contexts. Afterward, a sample of Green Plans and Strategies from the Italian domestic context is analyzed across a deducted analytical framework including four dimensions: biodiversity goals, targets, commitment to implementation, and public participation. Results from the analysis emphasize the focus of the green plans generally oriented to conserve existing biodiverse urban areas rather than radically igniting new possibilities in spaces where biodiversity can be restored, or it is already present but not perceived by local communities. Lastly, the article highlights four gaps characterizing the biodiversity-planning nexus, in its theoretical and operational implications.
Downloads
References
Atiqul Haq, S. M., Islam, M. N., Siddhanta, A., Ahmed, K. J. & Chowdhury, M.T.A. (2021). Public Perceptions of Urban Green Spaces: Convergences and Divergences. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2021.755313
Beute, F., Andreucci, M.B., Lammel, A., Davies, Z., Glanville, J., Keune, H., Marselle, M., O’Brien, L., Olszewska-Guizzo, A., Remmen, R., Russo, A., & de Vries, S. (2020). Types and characteristics of urban and peri-urban green spaces having an impact on human mental health and wellbeing. Report prepared by an EKLIPSE Expert Working Group. Wallingford: UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology.
Bianconi, F., Clemente, M., Filippucci, M., & Salvati, L. (2018). Regenerating Urban Spaces: A Brief Commentary on Green Infrastructures for Landscape Conservation. TeMA. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 11 (1), 107-118. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/5216
Bradley, S., Mahmoud, I. H., & Arlati, A. (2022). Integrated Collaborative Governance Approaches towards Urban Transformation: Experiences from the CLEVER Cities Project. Sustainability 14 (23), 15566. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU142315566
Brunetta, G., & Voghera, A. (2014). Resilience Through Ecological Network. TeMA. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment. Special Issue INPUT 2014. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/2539
Buijs, A., Hansen, R., van der Jagt, S., Ambrose-Oji, B., Elands, B., Lorance Rall, E., Mattijssen, T., Pauleit, S., Runhaar, H., Stahl Olafsson, A., & Steen Møller, M. (2019). Mosaic governance for urban green infrastructure: Upscaling active citizenship from a local government perspective. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 40, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.06.011
Bulkeley, H., Xie, L., Bush, J., Rochell, K., Greenwalt, J., Runhaar, H., van Wyk, E., Oke, K., & Coetzee, I. (2022). Cities and the Transformation of Biodiversity Governance. In I. J. Visseren-Hamakers, & M.T.J. Kok (Eds.), Transforming Biodiversity Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108856348
Bush, J. (2020). The role of local government greening policies in the transition towards nature-based cities. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 35, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.01.015
Cardona Santos, E. M., Kinniburgh, F., Schmid, S., Büttner, N., Pröbstl, F., Liswanti, F.N., Komarudin, H., Borasino, E. Ntawuhiganayo, E.B., & Zinngrebe, Y. (2023). Mainstreaming revisited: Experiences from eight countries on the role of National Biodiversity Strategies in practice. Earth System Governance 16, 100177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2023.100177
Castaldo, A. G., Mahmoud, I., & Morello, E. (2021). Ecosystem-Based Adaptation Approach and Adaptation Planning Support Tools: Potential Implementation for the Urban Context. In D. La Rosa & R. Privitera (Eds.), Innovation in Urban and Regional Planning, 23–32, Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68824-0_3
Convention on Biological Diversity CBD (2022). Kunming-Montreal Global biodiversity framework, Draft decision submitted by the President. Retrieved from: https://www.cbd.int/conferences/2021-2022/cop-15/documentsasdocument:CBD/COP/15/L25-.
Colavitti, A.M., Usai, N., & Bonfiglioli, S. (2013). Urban Planning in Italy: The Future of Urban General Plan and Governance. European Planning Studies 21 (2), 167-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.722913
Comitato per lo Sviluppo del Verde Pubblico, MATTM (2017). Linee guida per il governo sostenibile del verde urbano e prime indicazioni per una pianificazione sostenibile. Retrieved from: https://www.mase.gov.it/sites/default /files/archivio/allegati/comitato%20verde%20pubblico/linee_guida_finale_25_maggio_17.pdf
Comune di Bologna (2022). Bologna Urban Climate Green Assets Strategy, European Project LIFE Clivut LIFE 19GIC/IT/001217. Retrieved from: https://www.comune.bologna.it/servizi-informazioni/progetto-europeo-clivut.
Comune di Ferrara (2019). Piano d’Azione sulle Infrastrutture Verdi Urbane, Progetto PERFECT, novembre 2019, approvato con deliberazione del Consiglio Comunale del 26 novembre 2019. Retrieved from: https://servizi.comune.fe.it/9473/piano-di-azione-sulle-infrastrutture-verdi-urbane
Comune di Forlì (2020). Piano del Verde del Comune di Forlì, approvato con deliberazione del Consiglio Comunale n. 365/2021 del 3 novembre 2021.
Comune di Padova (2022). Il Piano del Verde Comunale, approvato il 28 marzo 2022 con deliberazione del Consiglio Comunale n. 2022/029. Retrieved from: https://www.padovanet.it/informazione/piano-del-verde-comunale
Comune di Parma (2022). Piano del Verde del Comune di Parma, approvato con deliberazione del Consiglio Comunale del 22 marzo 2021. Retrieved from: https://www.comune.parma.it/verde-pubblico/
Comune di Torino (2020). Piano Strategico dell’Infrastruttura Verde, dicembre 2020. Retrieved from: http://www.comune.torino.it/verdepubblico/il-verde-a-torino/piano-infrastruttura-verde/.
Comune di Vicenza (2018). Piano del Verde Urbano. Retrieved from: https://www.comune.vicenza.it/utilita/documento .php/199419
Cordini, M., Lazzarini, L., Pacchi, C., Parma, A., & Ranci, C. (2021). Italy. In M. Neergaard & R. Skovgaard Nielsen (Eds.). Cohesion on the ground. Perspectives and experiences, Aalborg: Department of Built Environment, Aalborg University, 86-103.
da Silva, J. M. C., & Wheeler, E. (2017). Ecosystems as infrastructure. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation 15 (1), 32–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2016.11.005
European Commission (2020a). Biodiversity Strategy for 2030: Bringing nature back into our lives. Retrieved from: https://environment.ec.europa.eu/strategy/biodiversity-strategy-2030_en.
European Commission (2020b). Nature-Based Solutions: State of the Art in EU-funded projects. https://doi.org/10.2777/236007
Frantzeskaki, N., Mahmoud, I. H., & Morello, E. (2022). Nature-Based Solutions for Resilient and Thriving Cities: Opportunities and Challenges for Planning Future Cities. In I.H. Mahmoud, E. Morello, F. Lemes de Oliveira, D. Geneletti (Eds). Nature-based Solutions for Sustainable Urban Planning. Contemporary Urban Design Thinking. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89525-9_1
Hartmann, T., Straalen, F., & Spit, T. (2018). Expectation management at the local scale: Legal failure of public participation for large urban planning projects. TeMA. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment 11 (1), 133-145. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/5369
IPCC (2018). Summary for Urban Policy makers: What the IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C for means for Cities. http://doi.org/10.24943/SCPM.2018%3E
Kauark-Fontes, B., Marchetti, L., & Salbitano, F. (2023). Integration of nature-based solutions (NBS) in local policy and planning toward transformative change. Evidence from Barcelona, Lisbon, and Turin. Ecology and Society, 28 (2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-14182-280225
Kumar, P., Debele, S. E., Sahani, J. et al. (2021). An overview of monitoring methods for assessing the performance of nature-based solutions against natural hazards. Earth-Science Reviews 217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103603
LAND (2021). Piano del Verde di Bolzano. Analisi e quadro di sintesi interpretativo, approvato con deliberazione del Consiglio Comunale del 15 marzo 2021. Retrieved from: https://opencity.comune.bolzano.it/News/Comunicati-stampa/Approvato-il-nuovo-Piano-del-Verde#
Lazzarini, L. (2021). The Contested Countryside. The Contested Countryside. Spatial planning and governance across the urban/rural interface in Italy and England. Roma: INU Edizioni.
Mahmoud, I.H. (2022). Sociability in Cultural-Based Urban Regeneration Projects. In: I.H. Mahmoud (Ed.). Placemaking for Green Urban Regeneration, Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15408-9_3
Mahmoud, I., & Morello, E. (2021). Co-creation Pathway for Urban Nature-Based Solutions: Testing a Shared-Governance Approach in Three Cities and Nine Action Labs. In A. Bisello et al. (eds.), Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions, 259–276, Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57764-3
Mahmoud, I., Morello, E., Rizzi, D., & Wilk, B. (2022). Localizing Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Through Co-creation of Nature-Based Solutions (NBS). In R. Bears (Ed.). The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Futures, 980–996. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51812-7_354-1
Mahmoud, I.H., Morello, E., Vona, C., Benciolini, M., Sejdullahu, I., Trentin, M., & Pascual, K.H. (2021). Setting the Social Monitoring Framework for Nature-Based Solutions Impact: Methodological Approach and Pre-Greening Measurements in the Case Study from CLEVER Cities Milan. Sustainability 13, 9672. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179672
Mansur, A. V., McDonald, R. I., Güneralp, B., Kim, H. J., de Oliveira, J. A. P., Callaghan, C.T., Hamel, P., Kuiper, J.J., Wolff, M., Liebelt, V., Martins, I.S., Elmqvist, T., & Pereira, H.M. (2022). Nature futures for the urban century: Integrating multiple values into urban management. Environmental Science and Policy 131, 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.01.013
MASE Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Sicurezza Energetica (2023), Strategia Nazionale Biodiversità 2030. Retrieved from: https://www.mase.gov.it/sites/default/files/archivio/allegati/biodiversita/strategia_nazionale_biodiversita_2030.pdf.
Neuman, M. (2019). Viewpoint Is resilience planning’s holy grail? Town Planning Review 90 (2), 109–115. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2019.9
Nilon, C.H., Aronson, M.F., Cilliers, S., Dobbs, C., Frazee, L., Goddard, M.A., O’Neill, K.M., Roberts, D., Stander, E.K., Werner, P., Winter, M., & Yocom, K.P. (2017). Planning for the Future of Urban Biodiversity: A Global Review of City-Scale Initiatives. BioScience 67 (4): 332–342. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix012
Oke, C., Bekessy, S.A., Frantzeskaki, N., Bush, J., Fitzsimons, J., Garrard, G.E., Grenfell, M., Harrison, L., Hartigan, M., Callow, D., Cotter, B., & Gawler, S. (2021). Cities should respond to the biodiversity extinction crisis. Npj Urban Sustainability 1 (11). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-020-00010-w
Pascual, U., Adams, W. M., Díaz, S., Lele, S., Mace, G. M., & Turnhout, E. (2021). Biodiversity and the challenge of pluralism. Nature Sustainability 4 (7), 567–572. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00694-7
Pereira, P. & Baró, F. (2022). Greening the city: Thriving for biodiversity and sustainability. Science of the Total Environment 817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153032
Pluchinotta, I., Salvia, G., & Zimmermann, N. (2022). The importance of eliciting stakeholders’ system boundary perceptions for problem structuring and decision-making. European Journal of Operational Research 302 (1), 280–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.12.029
Reckien, D., Buzasi, A., Olazabal, M., Spyridaki, N.-A., Eckersley, P., et al. (2023). Quality of urban climate adaptation plans over time. Npj Urban Sustainability 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-023-00085-1
Rega‑Brodsky, C.C., Aronson, M.F., Piana, M.R., et al. (2022). Urban biodiversity: State of the science and future directions. Urban Ecosystems 25: 1083–1096. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-022-01207-w
Rizzi, D. (2023). Biodiversity-positive Design in Urban Areas with NBS: Approaches, Design Brief “Recommendations for Biodiversity-positive Design with Nature-based Solutions (NBS)”. Retrieved from: https://networknature.eu/product/29463
Ronchi, S. & Salata, S. (2022). Insights for the Enhancement of Urban Biodiversity Using Nature-Based Solutions: The Role of Urban Spaces in Green Infrastructures Design. In I.H. Mahmoud, E. Morello, F. Lemes de Oliveira, D. Geneletti (Eds.) Nature-based Solutions for Sustainable Urban Planning. Contemporary Urban Design Thinking. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89525-9_3
Ruf, K., Gregor, M., Davis, M., Naumann, S., & Mcfarland, K. (2018). The European Urban Biodiversity Index (EUBI): a composite indicator for biodiversity in cities. ETC/BD report to the EEA. Retrieved from: https://www.eionet.europa.eu/etcs/etc-bd/products/etc-bd-reports/eubi_cities_biodiversity_indicator.
Salata, S. (2023). Piani e progetti per la Biodiversità urbana e per la gestione sostenibile del suolo. Urbanistica Informazioni 308: 13-14.
Salata, K., & Yiannakou, A. (2016). Green Infrastructure and climate change adaptation. TeMA. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment 9(1), 7-24. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/3723
Tozer, L., Bulkeley, H., & Xie, L. (2022). Transnational Governance and the Urban Politics of Nature-Based Solutions for Climate Change. Global Environmental Politics 3, 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep
Tulisi, A. (2017). Urban Green Network Design: Defining green network from an urban planning perspective. TeMA. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment 10(2), 179-192. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/5156
Uchida, K., Blakey, R. V., Burger, J. R., Cooper, D. S., Niesner, C. A., & Blumstein, D. T. (2021). Urban Biodiversity and the Importance of Scale. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 36(2), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2020.10.011
Vagias, W. M. (2006). Likert-type scale response anchors. Clemson International Institute for Tourism & Research Development, Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management, Clemson University.
Xie, L., Bulkeley, H., & Tozer, L. (2022). Mainstreaming sustainable innovation: unlocking the potential of nature-based solutions for climate change and biodiversity. Environmental Science & Policy 132, 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.02.017
Copyright (c) 2024 TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following:
1. Authors retain the rights to their work and give in to the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution that allows others to share the work indicating the authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors can adhere to other agreements of non-exclusive license for the distribution of the published version of the work (ex. To deposit it in an institutional repository or to publish it in a monography), provided to indicate that the document was first published in this journal.
3. Authors can distribute their work online (ex. In institutional repositories or in their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and it can increase the quotations of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access)