Environmental factors affecting living comfort perception in different localities in Sri Lanka
Abstract
The living in comfort and the consequent healthier life is a reaction to the environment indicated by the absence of environmental stressors. The present study investigated the factors influencing the living comfort perception in an urban and a non-urban locality in Sri Lanka. A survey using a pre-tested questionnaire was carried out to solicit the people’s perceptions on identified environmental factors randomly selecting fifty households from each locality. The results showed the factors i.e., stray animals, dust and garbage negatively affected living comfort in both urban and non-urban localities while temperature, insects, flood, noise, smoke, vibration, and bad odor negatively affected living comfort in the urban locality. Further, the factors i.e., rainfall, wind, humidity and drinking water were not important for living comfort perception in both localities. The factors i.e., water bodies, space, natural beauty, and biodiversity affected the living comfort positively in the urban locality. The factors identified in this study are useful in zoning the localities according to their suitability in relation to public comfort perception. Further, the identified factors can be manipulated to improve the living comfort perception in urban and non-urban localities.
Downloads
References
Alsayed, S. S. (2024). Urban human needs: conceptual framework to promoting urban city fulfils human desires. Front. Sustain. Cities 6:1395980. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2024.1395980
Arnfield, A. J. (2003). Two decades of urban climate research: a review of turbulence, exchanges of energy and water, and the urban heat island. International Journal of Climatology, 23 (1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.859
Brenner, N. & Schmid, C. (2015). Towards a new epistemology of the urban? City, 19 (2-3), 151-182. https://doi.org/1 0.1080/13604813.2015.1014712
Brunetta, G. & Voghera, A. (2014). Resilience Through Ecological Network. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/2539
Cervinka, R., Röderer, K. & Hefler, E. (2011). Are nature lovers happy? On various indicators of well-being and connectedness with nature. Journal of Health Psychology, 17 (3), 379-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105311416873
Chen, L. & Ng, E. (2012). Outdoor thermal comfort and outdoor activities: A review of research in the past decade. Cities. 29 (2), 118-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.08.006
De Looze, M. P., Kuijt-Evers, L. F. & Van Dieen, J. A. A. P. (2003). Sitting comfort and discomfort and the relationships with objective measures. Ergonomics. 46 (10), 985-997. https://doi.org/10.1080/0014013031000121977
Echevarria Icaza, L., Van der Hoeven, F. & Van den Dobbelsteen, A., (2016). Surface thermal analysis of North Brabant cities and neighbourhoods during heat waves. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 9 (1), 63-87. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/3741
Ghasemi, Z., Esfahani, M. A. & Bisadi, M. (2015). Promotion of Urban Environment by Consideration of Human Thermal & Wind Comfort: A Literature Review. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 201, 397-408. https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.sbspro.2015.08.193
Isola, F., Leone, F. & Pittau, R. (2023). Evaluating the urban heat island phenomenon from a spatial planning viewpoint. A systematic review. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 75-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/10306
Kabisch, N., Frantzeskaki, N. & Hansen, R. (2022). Principles for urban nature-based solutions. Ambio, 51, 1388-1401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01685-w
Karanikola, P., Manolas, E., Tampakis, S. & Panagopoulos, T. (2012). The Coexistence of Humans and Companion Animals in the City Parks of Xanthi: The Views of the Citizens. Urban Studies Research, 2012, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1155/ 2012/462025
Keles, R. (2012). The Quality of Life and the Environment. Procedia. Social and Behavioral Sciences. 35, 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.059
Klemm, W., Heusinkveld, B. G., Lenzholzer, S. & van Hove, B. (2015). Street greenery and its physical and psychological impact on thermal comfort. Landscape and Urban Planning. 138, 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.009
Kolcaba, K. Comfort theory and practice: a vision for holistic health care and research. Ottawa: Springer Publishing Company; 2003.
Kurochkina, V. (2020). Urban water bodies as the basis for functioning of public spaces. E3S Web of Conferences 217, 02005. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021702005
Lemelin, R. H., Harper, R. W., D. J., Bowles., R. & Balika, D. (2016). Humans, Insects and Their Interaction: A Multi-faceted Analysis. Animal Studies Journal, 5 (1), 65-79.
Liu, G., Lei, J., Qin, H., Niu, J., Chen, J., Lu, J. & Han, G. (2023). Impact of environmental comfort on urban vitality in small and medium-sized cities: A case study of Wuxi County in Chongqing, China. Front Public Health. 6 (11), 1131630. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1131630
Manteghi, G., Limit, H. B. & Remaz, D. (2015). Water Bodies an Urban Microclimate: A Review. Modern Applied Science. 9 (6), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v9n6p1
Margiotta, N., Palermo, A. & Viapiana, M.F. (2021). Environmental quality of emergency areas. A methodology to assess shelter areas liveability. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 135-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/7416
Matsuoka, R. H. & Kaplan, R. (2008). People needs in the urban landscape: Analysis of Landscape and Urban Planning contributions. Landscape and Urban Planning. 84 (1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.009
Mohamed Thariq, M. G., Munasinghe, H. P. & Abeysekara, J. D. (2010). Designing chairs with mounted desktop for university students: Ergonomics and comfort. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 40 (1), 8-18. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ergon.2009.10.003
Nikolopoulou, M., Kleissl., J and Linden, P.F. (2009). Perception of Air pollution and Comfort in the Urban Environment. CISBAT International Scientific Conference, Lausanne. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication /270685477 _PERCEPTION_OF_AIR_POLLUTION_AND_COMFORT_IN_THE_URBAN.
Oke, T. R., Zeuner, G. & Jauregui, E. (1992). The surface energy balance in Mexico City. Atmospheric Environment. Part B. Urban Atmosphere, 26 (4), 433-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0957-1272(92)90050-3
O'Riordan, T. (1983). Environmentalism. London: Pion.
Ortiz, M. A., Kurvers, S. R. & Bluyssen, P. M. (2017). A review of comfort, health, and energy use: Understanding daily energy use and wellbeing for the development of a new approach to study comfort. Energy and Buildings. 152, 323-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.07.060
Parson, K. (2015). The Environmental Ergonomics Survey. In J. R. Wilson and S. Sharples (Eds.), Evaluation of Human Work (4th ed., 641-653). CRC Press.
Pelorosso, R., Gobattoni, F., Lopez, N. & Leone, A. (2013). Urban Green and Environmental Processes: Towards a Multifunctional Landscape Design. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 6 (1), 95-111. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/1418
Pinto, S., Fumincelli, L., Mazzo, A., Caldeira, S. & Martins, J. C. (2017). Comfort, well-being and quality of life: Discussion of the differences and similarities among the concepts. Porto Biomedical Journal, 2 (1), 6-12. https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.pbj.2016.11.003
Reffat, R. & Harkness, E. L. (2000). ‘‘Development of an expert system for environmental quality evaluation.’’ Working Paper, Dept. of Arch. and Des. Sci., University of Sydney, Australia.
Santamouris, M., Papanikolaou, N., Livada, I., Koronakis, I., Georgakis, C., Argiriou, A. & Assimakopoulos, D. N. (2001). On the impact of urban climate on the energy consumption of buildings. Solar Energy. 70 (3), 201-216. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/s0038-092x(00)00095-5
Sheikh, M. & Mitchell, A. (2018). Design strategies for perceived acoustic comfort in urban environments - A literature review. Proceedings of ACOUSTICS 2018, 7-9 November 2018, Adelaide, Australia.
Stathopoulos, T., Wu, H. & Zacharias, J. (2004). Outdoor human comfort in an urban climate. Building and Environment. 39 (3), 297-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2003.09.001
tathopoulos, T., Wu, H. & Zacharias, J. (2004). Outdoor human comfort in an urban climate. Building and Environment, 39 (3), 297-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2003.09.001
Tulisi, A. (2017). Urban Green Network Design. Defining Green Network from an Urban Planning Perspective. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 10 (2), 179-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/5156
Waldron, J. A. (2018). Human behavior outdoors and the environmental factors (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Nottingham.
Zali, N., Gholami, N., Karimiazeri, A. R. & Azadeh, S. R. (2016). Planning according to new urbanism: the Ostadsara neighborhood case study. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 9 (3), 323-341. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.6092/1970-9870/4023
Y. Penga, T. & Fenga, H.J.P. Timmermans (2019). Expanded comfort assessment in outdoor urban public spaces using Box-Cox Transformation. Landscape and Urban Planning 190 (2019) 103594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan. 2019.103594
Yin, J., Zheng, Y., Wu, R., Tan, J., Ye, D. & Wang, W. (2012). An analysis of influential factors on outdoor thermal comfort in summer. Int J Biometeorol, 56(5), 941-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00484-011-0503-9
Copyright (c) 2024 TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following:
1. Authors retain the rights to their work and give in to the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution that allows others to share the work indicating the authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors can adhere to other agreements of non-exclusive license for the distribution of the published version of the work (ex. To deposit it in an institutional repository or to publish it in a monography), provided to indicate that the document was first published in this journal.
3. Authors can distribute their work online (ex. In institutional repositories or in their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and it can increase the quotations of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access)