Permanently temporary. Street experiments in the Torino Mobility Lab project

Keywords: Street experiments, From temporary to permanent, Pedestrian areas

Abstract

Street experiments introduce changes in the use, regulation or form of streets with the aim of triggering systemic shifts in urban mobility from motorized traffic to active travel and more livable public space. Generally intended to be temporary at implementation, street experiments may be repeated over time or even become permanent, depending on their success. This paper analyses four experimental road reallocation interventions that were implemented in August/December 2020 in the Italian city of Turin, as part of the Torino Mobility Lab project. These pedestrianizations were implemented in a temporary, experimental and low-cost way for four months, during which a monitoring activity was launched in order 1) to measure the use and the perception of the value of these temporary pedestrianizations in order to decide whether or not to make them permanent, and 2) to collect data on the ways they were used, as well as suggestions from their users for the design of the permanent versions of those that would have been confirmed. The paper analyses this monitoring/evaluation process and identifies some barriers and factors that can complicate and slow down the transition from temporary to permanent street reallocation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Luca Staricco, Interuniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning; Politecnico di Torino

Associate Professor in Spatial Planning at the Interuniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning (DIST), Politecnico di Torino. His main research fields are related to interactions between mobility and land use, coordination of spatial and transport planning, transit-oriented development, sustainable mobility, liveability of urban spaces, regional and urban resilience.

Ersilia Verlinghieri, School of Architecture and Cities; University of Westminster

Senior Research Fellow at the Active Travel Academy, University of Westminster and a Senior Researcher in Urban Mobility at the Transport Studies Unit, University of Oxford. Since 2012, her work focuses on developing theoretical and methodological approaches to issues of social and environmental justice in transport. Her research has a specific focus on participatory planning and research methodologies and in analysing the contribution of grassroots actors in reshaping transport policy and planning.

Elisabetta Vitale Brovarone, Interuniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning; Politecnico di Torino

Assistant Professor in Spatial Planning at the Interuniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning (DIST), Politecnico di Torino. Her research focuses on mobility, land use-transport interaction and accessibility, with various approaches, at different scales, in urban and rural contexts. She has also dealt with resilience, governance and local development in rural and mountain areas.

References

Abdelfattah, L., Deponte, D. & Fossa, G. (2022). The 15-minute city: Interpreting the model to bring out urban resiliencies. Transportation Research Procedia, 60, 330–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.12.043

ATI - Agenzia per lo sviluppo locale di San Salvario Onlus, Laqup, Solco Onlus, Urban Lab Torino (2020). Servizio di accompagnamento al progetto Torino Mobility Lab. Allegati. Retrieved from: https://torinomobilitylab.it/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Allegati-1-2-3_TorinoMobilityLab_Repor_ATI.pdf (accessed 1.3.23)

Bertolini, L. (2020). From “streets for traffic” to “streets for people”: Can street experiments transform urban mobility? Transport Reviews, 40 (6), 734–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2020.1761907

Bocca, A. (2024). Sustainable development and proximity city. The environmental role of new public spaces. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 17 (1), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/10414

Bragaglia, F., & Caruso, N. (2020). Temporary uses: A new form of inclusive urban regeneration or a tool for neoliberal policy? Urban Research & Practice, 0(0), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2020.1775284

Brand, C., Dons, E., Anaya-Boig, E., Avila-Palencia, I., Clark, A., de Nazelle, A., Gascon, M., Gaupp-Berghausen, M., Gerike, R., Götschi, T., Iacorossi, F., Kahlmeier, S., Laeremans, M., Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., Pablo Orjuela, J., Racioppi, F., Raser, E., Rojas-Rueda, D., Standaert, A., … Int Panis, L. (2021). The climate change mitigation effects of daily active travel in cities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 93, 102764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102764

Campisi, T., Basbas, S., Tesoriere, G., Canale, A., Vaitsis, P., Zeglis, D. & Andronis, C. (2020). Evaluation of Pedestrians’ Behavior and Walking Infrastructure Based on Simulation. In Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2020 (741–753), Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58802-1_53

D’Amico, A. (2023). Urban spaces and pedestrian mobility: the role of urban design for enhancing walkability. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 16 (3), 639-644. https://doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/10327

Davis, A. (2020). School Street Closures and Traffic Displacement Project: A Literature Review with semi-structured interviews. Transport Research Institute, Edinburgh Napier University

EMTA – European Metropolitan Transport Authorities (2021). EMTA Barometer 2021. Retrieved from: https://www.emta.com/IMG/pdf/211007-barometeremta-2019.pdf

Gehl, J. & Svarre, B. (2013). How To Study Public Life. Washington DC Island Press/Center for Resource Economics. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-525-0

Gössling, S., Schröder, M., Späth, P. & Freytag, T. (2016). Urban Space Distribution and Sustainable Transport. Transport Reviews, 36, 659–679, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1147101

Lahoorpoor, B., Wu, H., Rayaprolu, H. & Levinson, D. (2022). Prioritizing active transport network investment using locational accessibility. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 15 (2), 179-192. https://doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/9174

Mehta, V. & Bosson, J. K. (2021). Revisiting Lively Streets: Social Interactions in Public Space. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 41(2), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X18781453

Norton, P. (2015). Of love affairs and other stories. In Incomplete streets. Processes, practices, and possibilities (pp. 17–35). London & New York: Routledge

Sadik-Khan, J. & Solomonow, S. (2017). Streetfight: Handbook for an urban revolution. Penguin: New York.

Verlinghieri, E., Vitale Brovarone, E. & Staricco, L. (2023). The conflictual governance of street experiments, between austerity and post-politics. Urban Studies, 61 (5), 878-899. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980231193860

Vitale Brovarone, E., Staricco, L. & Verlinghieri, E. (2023). Whose is this street? Actors and conflicts in the governance of pedestrianisation processes. Journal of Transport Geography, 107, 103528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103528

von Schönfeld, K. C. & Bertolini, L. (2017). Urban streets: Epitomes of planning challenges and opportunities at the interface of public space and mobility. Cities, 68, 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.04.012

Published
2024-07-26
How to Cite
StariccoL., VerlinghieriE., & Vitale BrovaroneE. (2024). Permanently temporary. Street experiments in the Torino Mobility Lab project. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, (3), 159-167. https://doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/10934
Section
Special Issue - New challenges for sustainable urban mobility