Revitalization and ITS Impact on Public. Space Organization A Case Study of Manchester in UK, Lyon in France and Łódź in Poland
Abstract
Process of deindustrialization of downtowns in most of well-developed Western European countries has been undertaken since 1960’s while in post-socialist countries just from last 25 years, after political and economic transitions in Central and Eastern Europe. As far as urban structure is concerned, a new type of inner-city sites has appeared as a consequence of the collapse of industrial activities in second half of 20th century. In vast majority of cases newly developed morhological units (e.g. run-down post-industrial) have been unavailable to the public. As a reult, “classical” public space organization of European cities has been significantly changed. However, revitalization of post-industrial urban areas creates opportunities to reorganize public space according to current inhabitants and other urban space users’ needs. All transitions undertaken as a part of re-developement of brownfields sites are focused on impovements in physical and functional dimension of urban space quality to increase the standard of living condition. According to the concept of smat cities it is relaeted to “smart living” in sustainable urban environment. As a matter of fact, post-socialist cities in Central and Eastern Europe where interval of central planning was present in second half of 20th century and “classical” capitalist cites of Western Europe represent different patterns of public space transitions due to distinct historical development process of central space. In the paper a comparative study of Manchester, Lyon and Łódź is presented. The aim of the research is to indicate the reorganization of historically shaped public space structre in central space of analyzed cities after revitalization of post-industrial urban areas and new central space creation.Downloads
References
Jones P., Evans J. (2009), Urban Regeneration in the UK. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Kaczmarek S., Marcińczak S. (2013) The blessing in disguise: urban regeneration in Poland in a neoliberal milieu. In: Leary M.E., McCarthy J., (eds.) The Routledge Companion to Urban Regeneration. London-New York: Routledge. 98-107.
Kochanowska D. (2002) Przemiany śródmiejskich przestrzeni publicznych w Polsce. In: Kochanowski M. (ed.) Przestrzeń publiczna miasta postindustrialnego. Gdańsk: Gdańsk Technical University Press. 55-84.
Kostof S. (1991) The City Shaped: Urban Patterns and Meanings Trough History. London: Thames & Hudson.
Lorens P. (2010) Definiowanie współczesnej przestrzeni publicznej. In: Lorens P., Martyniuk-Pęczek J. (eds.) Problemy kształtowania przestrzeni publicznej. Gdańsk: Urganista Press. Seria Miasto-Metropolia-Region. 6-20.
Paccione M. (2001) Urban Geography: a global perspective. London-New York: Routledge.
Roberts P., Sykes H. (eds.) (2008) Urban Regeneration. A handbook. Los Angeles-London-New Dehli-Singapure-Washinton DC: SAGE.
Słodczyk J. (2012) Historia planowania i budowy miast. Opole: Opole University Press.
Stawasz D., Sikora-Fernandez D., Turała D. (2012), Koncepcja smart city jako wyznacznik podejmowania decyzji związanych z funkcjonowaniem i rozwojem miasta, Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Studia Informatica 721, 29: 97-109
Stott P. (2012) Industrial Heritageand the World Heritage Convention. In: Douet J. (ed.) Industrial heritage re-toled: The TICCIH guide to Industrial Heritage Conservation. Lancaster. 161-166.
Ziobrowski Z., Domański B. (2010) Rewitalizacja miast polskich jako sposób zachowania dziedzictwa materialnego i duchowego oraz czynnik zrównoważonego rozwoju. Podsumowanie projektu. Cracow: Institute of Urban Development.

Copyright (c) 2014 Tema. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following:
1. Authors retain the rights to their work and give in to the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution that allows others to share the work indicating the authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors can adhere to other agreements of non-exclusive license for the distribution of the published version of the work (ex. To deposit it in an institutional repository or to publish it in a monography), provided to indicate that the document was first published in this journal.
3. Authors can distribute their work online (ex. In institutional repositories or in their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and it can increase the quotations of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access)