Rural Architectural Intensification: A Multidisciplinar Planning Tool

  • Roberto De Lotto Department of Civil engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia
  • Tiziano Cattaneo Department of Civil engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia
  • Cecilia Morelli Di Popolo Department of Civil engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia
  • Sara Morettini Department of Civil engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia
  • Susanna Sturla Department of Civil engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia
  • Elisabetta Venco Department of Civil engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/2529
Keywords: Rural Architectural Intensification, Multidisciplinar approach, Planning tool, Methodology explanation

Abstract

When approaching a composite territorial problem that involves different scales and disciplines, it is necessary to establish a precise logical framework. Every planning or design activity is an iterative process applied to a complex system; not linear relations among the entities that compose the system are numerous and it is problematic to spell out them.  Authors developed a framework that has a hybrid structure in which different classical tool such as Spatial Decision Support Systems, Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), and Expert Systems (ES) converge. The method is not completely automatic and there is a continuous interaction between user and system. The main aim of the entire research group who participated to a national research (PRIN 2009) was to define an informed methodology for decision makers, stakeholders and public bureaus who have to (or want to) face the problem of improving and intensifying insediative activities in minor centers located in rural-urban context. In particular authors defined Rural Architectural Intensification (RAI) as a way to improve territorial features throughout a serie of interventions in small settlements and buildings. The explanation of the relations among different disciplines, different scales and different related methodologies is the key point of the paper. After an introduction and the description of RAI, authors introduce the main methodological structure; then each passage is detailed and specified considering the elements involved and the technical operations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Roberto De Lotto, Department of Civil engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia
Roberto De Lotto, Associate Professor in Urban Planning, DICAR/Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia.
Tiziano Cattaneo, Department of Civil engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia

Tiziano Cattaneo, Assistant Professor in Architectural Composition, DICAR/Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia.

Cecilia Morelli Di Popolo, Department of Civil engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia

Cecilia Morelli di Popolo, PhD student in Building Engineering/Architecture XXVI cycle, DICAR/Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture,University of Pavia.

Sara Morettini, Department of Civil engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia

Elisabetta Maria Venco, PhD student in Building Engineering/Architecture XXIX cycle, DICAR/Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture,University of Pavia.

Susanna Sturla, Department of Civil engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia

Sara Morettini, Scholarship holder in Urban Planning, UPLab (Urban Planning Laboratory), DICAR/Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture

Elisabetta Venco, Department of Civil engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia

Susanna Sturla, Scholarship holder in Urban Planning, UPLab (Urban Planning Laboratory), DICAR/Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture

References

AA.VV. (2009), I centri minori: recupero e valorizzazione: atti della XV conferenza internazionale Vivere e camminare in città 2008, EGAF Edizioni, Forlì.

AA.VV. (1998), Il paesaggio lombardo. Identità, conservazione e sviluppo, (ed. by) Benetti D., Langé S., Cooperativa Editoriale Quaderni Valtellinesi, Sondrio.

Anderberg M.R. (1973), Cluster Analysis for applications, Academic Press, INC., New York.

Blaschke T. (2006), “The role of the spatial dimension within the framework of sustainable landscape and natural capital” In: Landscape and Urban Planning, Volume 75, Issue 3-4, 198-226.

Borri D., Concilio G., Conte E. (1998), A fuzzy approach for modelling knowledge in environmental system evaluation, Comp. Environm. and Urban System, vol. 22, n. 3, 299-313.

Camiz S. (2004), Analisi esplorative di dati multidimensionali, tutorial per corso universitario presso Università di Roma “La Sapienza”.

Cano M., Garzon E., Sanchez-Soto P.J. (2013), “Historic preservation, GIS, & rural development: the case study of Almeria province, Spain” In: Applied Geography, n. 42, 34-47.

Carboz A. (1998), Ordine sparso. Saggi sull'arte, il metodo, la città e il territorio, (ed. by) P. Viganò, Franco Angeli, Milano.

Densham, P.J. (1991), “Spatial Decision Support Systems” In: McGuire, D.J., Goodchild, M.S., Rhind, D.W. (eds.) Geographical Information Systems: principle and application, Longman, England.

Fayyad U., Piatetsky-Shapiro G., Smyth P. (1996), “From Data Mining to Knowledge Discovery: An Overview” In: Fayyad U., Piatetsky-Shapiro G., Smyth P., Uthurusamy R. (eds.) Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, AAAI Press/The MIT Press.

Frampton K. (1991), “In search of the Modern Landscape” In: AA.VV., Denatured visions. Landscape and culture in the Twentieth century, Published by The Museum of Modern Art, New York.

Fuentes, J.M. (2013), “Methodological bases for documenting and reusing vernacular farm architecture” In: Journal of Cultural Heritage, Volume 11, Issue 1, 119-129.

Getis A., Ord J.K. (1992), “The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics” In: Geo-graphical analysis, Volume 24, Issue 3, 189-206.

Jambu M., Lebeaux M.O. (1983), Cluster Analysis and data analysis, North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.

Jongam R.H.G. (2002), Landscape Planning for Biological Diversity in Europe, (Eds.) Routledge, Oxford UK.

Keenan, P. B. (2003), “Spatial Decision Support Systems” In: Mora M., Forgionne G., and J. N. D. Gupta J.N.D. (Eds.) Decision Making Support Systems: Achievements and challenges for the New Decade Idea Group, 28-39.

Malczewski J. (1999), GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.

Multiplicity.lab, Centro Studi PIM, Comune di Milano (2009), Le cascine di Milano verso ed oltre Expo 2015; un sistema di luoghi dedicati all’agricolture, all’alimentazione, all’abitare e alla cura.

Murgante B., Borruso G., Lapucci A. (2009), “Geocomputation and urban planning” In: Murgante, B., Borruso, G., Lapucci, A.(Eds.), Geocomputation and Urban Planning Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol.176. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1-18.

Murgante B., Danese M. (2011), “Urban versus Rural: the decrease of agricultural areas and the development of urban zones analyzed with spatial statistics” In Special Issue on Environmental and agricultural data processing for water and territory management, International Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Information Systems (IJAEIS), Volume 2, Issue 2, 16-28.

Murgante B., Danese M., Las Casas G. (2012), Analyzing Neighbourhoods Suitable for Urban Renewal Programs with Autocorrelation Techniques, Advances in Spatial Planning, (Eds.) Dr Jaroslav Burian InTech.

Seddon G. (1986), “Landscape planning: a conceptual perspective” In: Landscape and Urban Planning, Volume 13, 335-347.

Spaziante A., Murano, C. (2009), “Rural development programs and strategic environmental assessment: towards a sustainable rural territory” In: International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, Volume 8, Issue 2, 205-223.

Terano T., Asai K., Sugeno M. (1992), Fuzzy system theory and its applications, Academic Press, San Diego, California.

Thompson W.J., Sorving K. (2000), Sustainable landscape construction, Island Press, Washington DC.

Spath H. (1980), Cluster Analysis Algorithms for data reduction and classification of objects, Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester UK.

Van der Vaart J.H.P. (2005), “Towards a new rural landscape: consequences of non-agricultural re-use of redundant farm buildings in Friesland” In Landscape and Urban Planning, n.70, Issue 1, 143-152.

Voogd H. (1983), Multicriteria evaluation for urban and regional planning, Pion, London.

Wang Z.J., Feng S. (1992) Expert system – based decision support system, workshop on Suppurt Systems for Decision and Negotiation Processes.

Published
2014-05-18
How to Cite
De LottoR., CattaneoT., Morelli Di PopoloC., MorettiniS., SturlaS., & VencoE. (2014). Rural Architectural Intensification: A Multidisciplinar Planning Tool. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/2529
Issue
2014: INPUT 2014 - Smart City: planning for energy, transportation and sustainability of the urban system
Section
input2014

Copyright (c) 2014 Tema. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following:

1. Authors retain the rights to their work and give in to the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution that allows others to share the work indicating the authorship and the initial publication in this journal.

 

2. Authors can adhere to other agreements of non-exclusive license for the distribution of the published version of the work (ex. To deposit it in an institutional repository or to publish it in a monography), provided to indicate that the document was first published in this journal.


3. Authors can distribute their work online (ex. In institutional repositories or in their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and it can increase the quotations of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access)