Exploring Issues Limiting the Use of Knowledge in Disaster Risk Reduction.
This paper highlights issues that appear to have hampered the development and use of knowledge and discusses what these imply for applying (or not) the concept of smart cities in different contexts. The conclusions are based on the findings of four sets of work in the context of the KNOW-4-DRR project. From the findings of these activities, it emerges that although there are differences in context, risk and culture, there is a surprising degree of commonality in opinions about why there is insufficient development and application of knowledge for disaster risk reduction, despite the large volumes of information developed on this subject. As regards ICTs, findings suggest that technology, although useful, is not the sole solution for knowledge- based decision making for DRR. In this respect the benefits of smartness in cities are uncertain and depend on the context, where the employment of simpler or more traditional means can be more appropriate for enabling knowledge.
A final conclusion is that no matter how useful, knowledge itself is not a panacea for DRR. Decision-making is invariably influenced by conflicting priorities, objectives and constraints, and not necessarily in all stakeholders’ interests or even reflecting their objectives. For example in the midst of the Greek economic crisis, disaster risk awareness and acceptability are becoming less a matter of DRR information and knowledge and must rather be addressed with a view to the new hierarchy of risks (socio-economic, health, emerging) generated by the crisis. However, acknowledging the complexity of the issue should not stand in the way of much needed efforts towards enabling knowledge for DRR with all the tools available in today’s changing world.
Atun, F. (2013). Enhancing Resilience of Transportation Systems in Case of Disasters. Ph.D. Thesis, Politecnico di Milano, Department of Architecture and Urban Studies, PhD. Program in Spatial Planning and Urban Development, 25th Cycle. March 2013.
Atun, F. (2014). Improving Societal resilience to Disasters. A case study of London’s Transportation System. Springer. ISSN 2282-2577.
Brodine. M. (2013). The real scientific uncertainties about climate change. Accessible at: http://peoplesworld.org/the-real-scientific-uncertainties-about-climate-change/
Cash, D. W., W. C. Clark, F. Alcock, N. M. Dickson, N. Eckley, D. H. Guston, J. Jäger, and R. B. Mitchell. (2003). “Knowledge Systems for Sustainable Development.” PNAS, 100 (14): 8086-8091.
Dandoulaki, M., T. Karymbalis, G. Melissourgos, S. Skordili, and K. Valkanou (2014). Analysis of main fragmentation issues within different stakeholder groups – Part 4. Knowledge in the private sector and the civil society. Know-4-DRR Deliverable 1.2. [online] www.know4drr.polimi.it
Dandoulaki, M., T. Karymbalis, G. Melissourgos, and S. Skordili (2014). From decision to implementation: Barriers and bridges for implementing mitigation and adaptation measures and strategies in times of financial, institutional and political crisis. Know-4-DRR Deliverable 2.4. [online] www.know4drr.polimi.it
De Grove, T., K. Poljansek, D. Ehrlich (2013). Recording Disaster Losses. Recommendations for a European Research. JRC Scientific and Policy reports. Joint Research Centre, European Commission.
Engel, K., G. Frerks, J. Warner, and B. Weijs. (2014). “Flood Disaster Subcultures in The Netherlands: the Parishes of Borgharen and Itteren.” Natural Hazards, 73 (2): 859-882.
Gaillard, J. C., and J. Mercer. (2012). From Knowledge to Action: Bridging Gaps in Disaster Risk Reduction. Progress in Human Geography. doi. 10.1177/0309132512446717.
IMM, Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality, (2008). [online] http://www.ibb.gov.tr/en-US/Pages/Home_Page.aspx
Karanikola P., S. Tampakis, E. Manolas, and G. Tsantopoulos et al. (2013). Analysing the Impacts of Information in the Prevention of Forest Fires in Greece. Journal of Spatial and Organizational Dynamics, 1 (2): 71-81.
Menoni, S., J. Weichselgartner, M. Dandoulaki, N. Valkanou, M. J. Jimenez, M. Garcia Fernandez, S. Kienberger, R. Spiekermann, P. Pigeon, F. Briones, J. Norton, and R. Nussbaum (2014). Enabling knowledge for disaster risk reduction and its integration into climate change adaptation. Input paper prepared for the Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2015.
Mercer, J., I. Kelman, L. Taranis, and S. Suchet-Pearson. (2010). Framework for integrating Indigenous and scientific Knowledge for Disaster Risk Reduction. Disasters, 34: 214–239.
Negre, E., C. Rosenthal-Sabroux, and M. Gasco (2015). A knowledge- based conceptual; vision of smart city. IEEE, 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. DOI 10.1109/HICSS.2015.279
Negre, E., C. Rosenthal-Sabroux, and M. Gasco (2015). A Knowledge-Based Conceptual Vision of the Smart City. HICSS 2015, 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 2317-2325, doi:10.1109/HICSS.2015.279
Nhan, N. T. (2015) Smart cities to shape Vietnam’s future. Vietnam investment Review, [online] http://www.vir.com.vn/ 07/09/2105
Norton, J., G. Chantry (2011). “Impact Study on Developing Local Capacity to Reduce Vulnerability and Poverty - Disaster Risk Reduction in Central Vietnam” Building & Social Housing Foundation, available at http://www.bshf.org/published-information/publication.cfm?thePubID=E0FC8AB8-15C5-F4C0-999B59AB589F5DE9
Norton, J., G. Chantry (2015). The "Living Lab" experience: knowledge transfer between stakeholders in central Vietnam faced with regular typhoons and floods. KNOW-4-DRR Task 3.2 Final report. [online] www.know4drr.polimi.it
Norton, J., G. Chantry (2014). Mapping exchange of knowledge to support DRR” KNOW-4-DRR Deliverable 2.1. [online] www.know4drr.polimi.it
Pigeon, P. (2013). Applying the disaster stakeholder matrix to the case of La Faute sur Mer disaster, Feb. 2010. UNISAVOIE, Case Study submitted to KNOW-4-DRR project.
Schaffers, H., N. Komninos, M. Pallot, and B. Trousse, M. Nilsson, and A. Oliveira (2011). Smart cities and the future internet: Towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation. In: J. Domingue et al. (Eds.): Future Internet Assembly, LNCS 6656, pp. 431–446, 2011. Accessible at: SpringerLink.com.
Spiekermann, R., S. Kienberger, J. Norton, F. Briones and J. Weichselgartner (2015). The Disaster-Knowledge Matrix – Reframing and evaluating the knowledge challenges in disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 13 (2015) 96-108.
TiConUno. (2014). Guidelines to develop a communication activity for radio and web-TV. KNOW-4-DRR deliverable 3.5.
TUIK. (2011). Turkey’s statistical yearbook. Turkish Statistical Institute. [online] http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/
Weichselgartner, J., and P. Pigeon (2015). The role of knowledge in disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, (2015) 6:107–116. DOI 10.1007/s13753-015-0052-7.
White, G., R. W. Kates, and I. Burton (2001). Knowing Better and Losing Even More: the Use of Knowledge in Hazards Management. Global Environmental Change, Part B: Environmental Hazards 3 (3–4): 81–92.
Copyright (c) 2015 Tema. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following:
1. Authors retain the rights to their work and give in to the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution that allows others to share the work indicating the authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors can adhere to other agreements of non-exclusive license for the distribution of the published version of the work (ex. To deposit it in an institutional repository or to publish it in a monography), provided to indicate that the document was first published in this journal.
3. Authors can distribute their work online (ex. In institutional repositories or in their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and it can increase the quotations of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access)