The Effectiveness of Urban Green Spaces and Socio-Cultural Facilities
AbstractThis paper aims to develop a theoretical approach for mapping and determining the effectiveness of green spaces and socio-cultural facilities as providers of urban ecosystem services and urban services in the case of Adana, Turkey. Firstly, green spaces and socio-cultural facilities per capita have been determined and indexed for the neighbourhoods in the city. Then, a distance-based method for estimating the effectiveness of these facilities was used. The distances between the various neighbourhoods and between a given facility and the farthest threshold have been measured and these values have been used to determine the facility effectiveness change value for each neighbourhood. Then, effective values have been calculated and indexed by incorporating the green space and socio-cultural facility values and the effectiveness change values for the neighbourhoods. Finally, point-based effective green spaces and socio-cultural facilities index values have been converted to continuous surface values in a GIS (geographic information system) environment in order to utilize as a base map for urban physical planning purposes. According to the outcomes of this study, the distribution of green spaces and socio-cultural facilities of the neighbourhoods are imbalanced and index values of these facilities range in between 45 and 84 out of 100.
Adana Urban Council (2015). Demographic, Economic and Housing Statistics for Adana City. Retrieved December 27, 2015 from: http://www.adana.bel.tr/istatistikler/ (in Turkish).
Altunkasa, M. F., & Uslu, C. (2004). The effects of urban green spaces on house prices in the upper northwest urban development area of Adana (Turkey). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 28, 203-209.
Antognelli, S., & Vizzari, M. (2016). Ecosystem and urban services for landscape liveability: A model forquantification of stakeholders’ perceived importance. Land Use Policy, 50 (2016), 277-292. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.09.023.
Baycan-Levent, T., & Nijkamp, P. (2009). Planning and management of urban green spaces in Europe: Comparative analysis. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 135, 1-12. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2009)135:1(1)#sthash.pyjCVyhJ.dpuf.
Berberoğlu, S., Lloyd, C. D., Atkinson, P. M., & Curran, P. J. (2000). The integration of spectral and textural information using neural networks for land cover mapping in the Mediterranean. Computers and Geosciences, 26, 385-396. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(99)00119-3.
Bolund, P., & Hunhammar, S. (1999). Ecosystems services in urban areas. Ecological Economics, 29, 293-301. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00013-0.
Bonaiuto, M., Aiello, A., Perugini, M., Bonnes, M., & Ercolani, A. P. (1999). Multidimensional perception of residential environment quality and neighbourhood attachment in the urban environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 331-352. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0138.
Bonaiuto, M., Fornara, F., & Bonnes, M. (2003). Indexes of perceived residential environment quality and neighbourhood attachment in urban environments: A confirmation study on the City of Rome. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 41-52. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00236-0.
Cohen, M. (1996). Habitat II and the challenge of the urban environment: Bringing together the two definitions of habitat. International Social Science Journal, 48, 95-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2451.1996.tb00060.x.
Coles, R., & Caserio, M. (2003). Understanding and facilitating the social outputs of urban green spaces (Paper presented at the International Conference ‘Open Space, People Space’, Edinburgh). Retrieved March 04, 2013 from: http://www.academia.edu/download/42048822/Understanding_and_Facilitating_the_Socia20160204-27525-1lo7nvh.pdf.
Coolen, H., & Meesters, J. (2012). Private and public green spaces: meaningful but different settings. Journal of Housing and Built Environment, 27, 49-67. doi:10.1007/s10901-011-9246-5.
Dunnett, N., Swanwick, C., & Woolley, H. (2002). Improving Urban Parks, Play Areas and Green Spaces. Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions, London. Retrieved April 15, 2009 from: http://publiekeruimte.info/Data/Documents/e842aqrm/53/Improving-Urban-Parks.pdf.
English, D. B. K., Betz, C. J., Young, J. M., Bergstrom, J. C., & Cordell, H. K. (1993). Regional demand and supply projections for outdoor recreation. General Technical Report No. RM-230, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, August 1993, Colorado. Retrieved April 15, 2009 from: http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs_rm/rm_gtr230.pdf.
English, D. B. K., & Cordell, H. K. (1993). Effective Recreation Opportunity Set (EROS) index: A computable measure of recreation supply. Research Paper No. SE-286, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Asheville, North Carolina.
Gangloff, D. (1995). The sustainable city. American Forests, 101, 30-36.
Georgi, J. N., & Dimitriou, D. (2010). The contribution of urban green spaces to the improvement of environment in cities: Case study of Chania, Greece. Building and Environment, 45, 1401-1414. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.12.003.
Germann-Chiari, C., & Seeland, K. (2004). Are urban green spaces optimally distributed to act as places for social integration? Results of a Geographical Information System (GIS) approach for urban forestry research. Forest Policy and Economics, 6, 3-13. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00067-9.
Giles-Corti, B., Broomhall, M. H., Knuiman, M., Collins, C., Douglas, K., Ng, K., Lange, A., & Donovan, R. J. (2005). Increasing walking: How important is distance to, attractiveness and size of public open space? American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28, 169-176. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.018.
Gilliland, J., Holmes, M., Irwin, J. D., & Tucker, P. (2006). Environmental equity is child’s play: mapping public provision of recreation opportunities in urban neighbourhoods. Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies, 1(3), 256–268. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17450120600914522.
Gold, S. M. (1980). Recreation Planning and Design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gómez, F., Jabaloyes, J., Montero, L., De Vicente, V., & Valcuende, M. (2011). Green areas, the most significant indicator of the sustainability of cities: Research on their utility for urban planning. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 137, 311-328. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000060.
Gürbüz, M. (2012). Urban technical infrastructure impact assessment. Retrieved March 17, 2014 from: http://www.csb.gov.tr/db/altyapi/editordosya/14-%20Mehmet%20%20GURBUZ-ILBANK.pdf (in Turkish).
Haq, S. A. (2011). Urban green spaces and an integrative approach to sustainable environment. Journal of Environmental Protection, 2, 601-608. doi: 10.4236/jep.2011.25069.
Hicks, D. A. (1997). The inequality-adjusted human development index: A constructive proposal. World Development, 25, 1283-1298. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(97)00034-X.
Higgs, G., Fry, R., & Langford, M. (2012). Investigating the implications of using alternative GIS-based techniques to measure accessibility to green space. Environment and Planning B, 39, 326-343. doi: https://doi.org/10.1068/b37130.
Jim, C. Y. (2004). Green-space preservation and allocation for sustainable greening of compact cities. Cities, 21, 311-320. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2004.04.004.
Kabisch, N., & Haase, D. (2013). Green spaces of European cities revisited for 1990-2006. Landscape and Urban Planning, 110, 113-122. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.017.
Kabisch, N., & Haase, D. (2014). Green justice or just green? Provision of urban green spaces in Berlin, Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning, 122, 129-139. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.016.
Kotler, P., Jatusripitak, S., & Maesincee, S. (1997). The Marketing of Nations: A Strategic Approach to Building National Wealth. New York: Free Press.
Li, G., & Weng, Q. (2007). Measuring the quality of life in city of Indianapolis by integration of remote sensing and census data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 28, 249-267. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431160600735624.
Madanipour, A. (1999). Why are the design and development of public spaces significant for cities? Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26, 879-891. doi:http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1068/b260879.
Marcouiller, D. W., Prey, J., & Scott, I. (2009). The regional supply of outdoor recreation resources: Demonstrating the use of location quotients as a management tool. Journal of Parks and Recreation Administration, 27(4), 92-107.
Nega, T., Fu, W. H., & Vrtis, G. (2010). Open space index: A GIS-based tool for assessing human penetration of a landscape. Local Environment, 15, 743-759. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2010.509387.
Peschardt, K. K., Schipperijn. J., & Stigsdotter, U. K. (2012). Use of Small Public Urban Green Spaces (SPUGS). Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 11, 235-244. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.04.002.
Phillips, L. E. (1996). Parks: Design and Management. New York: McGraw-Hill. Pulido, A. (1972). Statistics and social research techniques. Madrid: Anaya (in Spanish).
Santerre, R. E. (1985). Spatial differences in the demands for local public goods. Land Economics, 61, 119-128. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3145804.
Schipperijn, J., Ekholm, O., Stigsdotter, U. K., Toftager, M., Bentsen, P., Kamper-Jørgensen, F., & Randrup, T. B. (2010). Factors influencing the use of green space: Results from a Danish national representative survey. Landscape and Urban Planning, 95, 130-137. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.12.010.
Schöpfer, E., Lang, S., & Blaschke, T. (2004). A green index incorporating remote sensing and citizen's perception of green space. Centre for Geoinformatics, University of Salzburg. Retrieved April 28, 2009 from http://ispace.researchstudio.at/sites/ispace.researchstudio.at/ files/145.pdf.
Schyns, P., & Boelhouwer, J. (2002). Measuring quality of life in Amsterdam from the viewpoint of participation. The Amsterdam Bureau for Research and Statistics/Social and Cultural Planning Office. Retrieved April 28, 2009, http://www.ois.amsterdam.nl/pdf/2002 _quality_of_life.pdf.
Ståhle, A. (2010). More green space in a denser city: Critical relations between user experience and urban form. Urban Design International, 15, 47-67. http://dx.doi.org/doi: 10.1057/udi.2009.27.
Uslu, C., Altunkasa, M. F., Boyacıgil, O., Konaklı, N., & Salıcı, A. (2012). Bicycle master plan for Adana, Turkey. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 138, 62-69. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000069#sthash.DyFAiTRM.dpuf.
Van Herzele, A., & Wiedemann, T. (2003). A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning, 63, 109-126. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00192-5.
Willis, K. G., Turner, R. K., & Bateman, I. J. (2001). Urban Planning and Management. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Yildiz, N. D., Demir, M., & Yilmaz, S. (2011). Determination of the efficiency of green areas in Erzurum city. Scientific Research and Essays, 6, 293-304. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/SRE10.674.
Copyright (c) 2017 Tema. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following:
1. Authors retain the rights to their work and give in to the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution that allows others to share the work indicating the authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors can adhere to other agreements of non-exclusive license for the distribution of the published version of the work (ex. To deposit it in an institutional repository or to publish it in a monography), provided to indicate that the document was first published in this journal.
3. Authors can distribute their work online (ex. In institutional repositories or in their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and it can increase the quotations of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access)