Physical spacing and spatial planning

New territorial geographies and renewed urban regeneration policies

Keywords: Physical spacing, new territorial geographies, urban regeneration

Abstract

After several months of total emergency, many of the countries concerned seem to have the Covid-19 pandemic under control. Measures and policies have been implemented almost worldwide to support the difficult economic and social recovery. The different national systems will be tested in terms of the degree of overall resilience and capacity and effectiveness of actions. In this sense, the reform of local autonomous areas and Regions becomes today even more necessary to start a long and complex process of decision-making and government-level reorganization fostering new relations, in terms of political representation and competences of the different institutional levels. The responses to limit the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the country's growth and development imply a reconfiguration of territorial and institutional geographies. In this context, the discipline of spatial planning can promote some useful reflections at two different scales of intervention: territorial and urban. This study follows these two trajectories, starting from the consideration that the choice of forcing so-called "physical distancing" (better than the ambiguous term "social distancing") has certainly represented one of the most effective ways of contrasting the contagion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Piergiuseppe Pontrandolfi, Dipartimento delle Culture Europee e del Mediterraneo University of Basilicata

He is an architect and associate professor of Urban Planning and Technique at DiCEM (Department of European Cultures of the Mediterranean) of the University of Basilicata in Matera. He carries out research activities on urban and territorial policies and on new forms and instruments of territorial governance. He is a member of several research groups within European projects on the themes of local development and territorial planning. He has written essays and articles in Italian and in international journals in the sector, as well as being the author of several publications. He has been Councillor for Urban Planning of the Municipality of Potenza. From 2003 to 2006 he was coordinator of the second level university Master's degree promoted by the University of Basilicata on "New instruments of governance and territorial management". Curator of the series "Territorio e Cultura di Piano" for publisher Librìa.

References

Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2007). The fluid scales and scope of UK spatial planning. Environment and Planning A, 39(6), 1478-1496. https://doi.org/10.1068/a38230

Archibugi, F. (2002). La città ecologica: urbanistica e sostenibilità. Bollati Boringhieri.

Borghi, E. (2017). Piccole Italie. Le aree interne e la questione territoriale. Donzelli, Roma.

Camagni, R. P., & Salone, C. (1993). Network urban structures in northern Italy: elements for a theoretical framework. Urban studies, 30(6), 1053-1064. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989320080941

Celata, F. (2008). L’individuazione di partizioni del territorio nelle politiche di sviluppo locale in Italia: ipotesi interpretative. Rivista geografica italiana, 115(2008), 1-25. Retrivied from: https://web.uniroma1.it/memotef/sites/default/files/Celata_RGI_Partizioni_2008.pdf

Dematteis, G. (2003). SLoT (Sistema locale territoriale). Uno strumento per rappresentare, leggere e trasformare il territorio. Documento del Convegno: per un patto di sostenibilità. Sviluppo locale e sostenibilità tra teoria e pratica.

De Rossi, A., & Barbera, F. (Eds.). (2018). Riabitare l'Italia: le aree interne tra abbandoni e riconquiste. Donzelli, pp. VIII-594.

Fanfano, D. (2001). La descrizione delle reti territoriali per il progetto di sviluppo locale autosostenibile. Magnaghi, A.(a cura di), Rappresentare i luoghi, metodi e tecniche. Alinea, Firenze.

Haughton, G., & Allmendinger, P. (2008). The soft spaces of local economic development. Local Economy, 23(2), 138-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/02690940801976216

Micelli, E. (2014). L’eccezione e la regola. Le forme della riqualificazione della città esistente tra demolizione e ricostruzione e interventi di riuso. Valori e Valutazioni, 12, 11-20. Retrivied from: https://urbanpromo.it/content/uploads/sites/2/2014/08/MICELLI-IUAV_Riqualificazione-della-citt%C3%A0-esistente-tra-demolizione-ricostruzione-e-riuso_Luglio2014.pdf

Parr, J. (2004). The polycentric urban region: a closer inspection. Regional studies, 38(3), 231-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/003434042000211114

Preto, G., & Occelli, S. (1994). Zonizzazione territoriale ed ambiti spaziali delle politiche: considerazioni teorico-metodologiche. IRES.

Pontrandolfi, P. Cartolano, A. (2019). Territori pluricomunali. Nuovi assetti istituzionali e strumenti per il governo del territorio e la promozione dello sviluppo locale. Melfi, Editore Librìa

Published
2020-06-19
How to Cite
Pontrandolfi, P. (2020). Physical spacing and spatial planning. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 315-326. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/6854
Section
Special Issue - Covid-19 vs City-20