Soft mobility planning for university cities: the case of Pavia
Abstract
University City concept means a specific urban structure characterized by the maximum expression of the relations system (social, environmental, economic) that can exist between university institution and administrative/political institution: in particular, the physical connections linked to the spatial location of university structures within the urban fabric.
In Pavia, between Municipality and University the development of common mobility strategies has been practically developed since the seventies of the XX century by Giancarlo De Carlo plan. From this period on, the centrality of the city emerged as magnet for the first and second tiers of adjacent Municipalities.
The need to implement forms of sustainable mobility aimed at improving the connections between university and city center, useful also to trigger deep urban regeneration processes, carried to experiment a collaborative planning process between university, Municipality and the main involved stakeholders. The main aim is to develop an overall strategy throughout the entire municipal territory and to define lines of actions (tactics) for the creation of a soft mobility network within the Pavia context as University City. The participatory process is implemented with the use of a Collaborative Planning tool based on Google functionalities. In the paper, authors describe the main elements of this project.
Downloads
References
Bender, T. (1988). The university and the city: from Medieval Origins to the Present, Oxford University Press, New York
Benneworth, P. (2010). Building localized interactions between universities and cities through university spatial development. European Planning Studies, 18.10, 1611-1629.
Brand, R.,& Gaffikin, F. 2007. Collaborative planning in an uncollaborative world. Planning Theory Vol 6.3, 282–313.
Brussel M., Zuidgeest M., Pfeffer K., & van Maarseveen, M. (2019). Access or Accessibility? A Critique of the Urban Transport SDG Indicator. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2019, 8, 67.
Buncuga, F. (2000) Conversazioni con Giancarlo De Carlo. Elèuthera.
Coppola Pignatelli, P. (1969). L’università in espansione: orientamenti dell’edilizia universitaria. Etas Kompas.
De Carlo, G. (1968). Pianificazione e disegno delle università. (Ed.) Edizioni universitarie italiane, Venezia.
De Carlo, G. (1972). Ordine - Istituzione Educazione – Disordine, Casabella, 368-369: 65-71.
De Carlo, G. (1974) Relazione e tavole de “Piano generale di sviluppo e ristrutturazione dell’Università di Pavia.
De Lotto, R., Morelli di Popolo, C., Sturla, S.& Venco, E.M. (2015). I City Campus. Territorio 73/2015,.100- 106.
De Lotto, R. (20089. Città e pianificazione. La tradizione di Pavia e le opportunità per il futuro. Maggioli Editore, 2008.
De Lotto, R., et al. (2014) “Pavia Città Universitaria: il patrimonio di idee di De Carlo nello sviluppo urbano”, XXXV Conferenza Italiana Di Scienze Regionali, Padova.
Di Leo, D. (2015). Università, istituzioni e territori: ripensamenti e opportunità tra opensource urbanism e prosumership. Territorio. FrancoAngeli, 73, 73-78.
D’Alpaos, C. et al. (2014) “Campus Universitari e modelli economico-territoriali: integrazione o isolamento?”, XXXV Conferenza Italiana Di Scienze Regionali, Padova.
Earth.org (2021) The '15-Minute City' Model: Encouraging Sustainable Cities. Retrieved from: https://earth.org/15-minute-city-model/
Healey, P. (1998). Collaborative Planning in a Stakeholder Society. Town Planning Review 69.1, 1–22.
Innes, J. & Booher, D. (1999). Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems – A Framework for Evaluating Collaborative Planning. APA Journal 65.4, 412–23.
Lazzeroni M. & Piccaluga A. (2009) “L’università che cambia: nuovi profili e nuovi metodi di analisi”, in Bramanti A., Salone C. (a cura di) Lo sviluppo territoriale nell’economia della conoscenza: teorie, attori, strategie. Franco Angeli, Milano.
Mambriani, A. (1999). Università Città Piano. (Ed.) Gangemi Editore, Roma.
Margerum, R.D. (2002). Collaborative Planning Building Consensus and Building a Distinct Model for Practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research 21,237-253.
Martinelli, N. (2012) Spazi della Conoscenza. Università, città e territori, Mario Adda Editore, Bari.
Martinelli, N. & Savino, M. (2012). (Ed.) L’Università italiana tra città e territorio nel XXI secolo Parte I, Urbanistica, n. 149, pp. 4-67.
Martinelli N. & Savino M. (2013). (Ed.) L’Università italiana tra città e territorio nel XXI secolo Parte II, Urbanistica, n. 150-151, pp. 10-43
Moreno C. (2016). La Ville du Quart D’heure: Pour un Nouveau Chrono-Urbanisme. Retrieved from: https://www.latribune.fr/regions/smart-cities/la-tribune-de-carlos-moreno/la-ville-du-quart-d-heure-pour-un-nouveau-chrono-urbanisme-604358.html
Moreno C., Allam Z., Chabaud D., Gall C. & Pratlong F. (2021) Introducing the “15-Minute City”: Sustainability, Resilience and Place Identity in Future Post-Pandemic Cities. Smart Cities, 4, 93–111.
National Law 28 luglio 1967, n. 641 e smi. Nuove norme per l'edilizia scolastica e universitaria e piano finanziario dell'intervento per il quinquennio 1967-1971. – retrive on 4/23/2021
Pavia municipality. Pavia City Plan. 2013 – retrive on 5/3/2021
Perin M. (1992). Giancarlo De Carlo. Un progetto guida per realizzare l’utopia. In: Di Biagi P., Gabellini P. (eds.) Urbanisti italiani. Piccinato Marconi Samonà Quaroni De Carlo Astengo Campos Venuti. Editore Laterza. 333-394.
Perry, D.C.& Wiewel, W. (2008) Global Universities and Urban Development. Case Studies and Analysis, M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, New York.
Perry, D.C. (2013) “Da enclave ad ‘Anchor institution’: sviluppo economico, città e università in Usa” in Urbanistica 150-151/2013: 35-43.
Preston J.& Rajé F. (2007). Accessibility, Mobility and Transport-Related Social Exclusion. J. Transp. Geogr, 15, 151–160.
Pozoukidou G.& Chatziyiannaki Z. (2021). 15-Minute City: Decomposing the New Urban Planning Eutopia. Sustainability, 13, 928
Savino, M. (1997). “Università, città, studenti: aspetti complessi di interdipendenza non sempre noti” in “Città e Università – Università vs Città”, Archivio di studi urbani e regionali, n.60-61: 25-35.
Savino, M. (1999). “L’università costruisce la città” in Inforum n.3/1999: 21-22.
Savino, M. (2013). “Università e città: quali relazioni?” in Urbanistica 150-151/2013: 10-14.
Tewdwr-Jones, M. & Allmendinger P. 2002. Planning Futures: New Directions in Planning Theory. (Ed.) London: Routledge.
Venco E.M. 2015. La Città universitaria come opportunità di sviluppo urbano. Urbanistica Informazioni 263, Special Issue. Atti della IX Giornata di Studi INU, II sessione: Rigenerazione urbana, pp.211-214.
Venco E.M. (2021) La mobilità per la città dei 15 minuti. Maggioli Editore. ISBN 978-88-916-5064-1
Weng M., Ding N., Li J., Jin X., Xiao H., He Z. & Su S. (2019) The 15-minute walkable neighborhoods: Measurement, social inequalities and implications for building healthy communities in urban China. Journal of Transport & Health 13 259–273
Copyright (c) 2022 TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following:
1. Authors retain the rights to their work and give in to the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution that allows others to share the work indicating the authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors can adhere to other agreements of non-exclusive license for the distribution of the published version of the work (ex. To deposit it in an institutional repository or to publish it in a monography), provided to indicate that the document was first published in this journal.
3. Authors can distribute their work online (ex. In institutional repositories or in their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and it can increase the quotations of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access)