Spatial Resilience of Outdoor Domestic Space in Mozambique
Abstract
Historically, the people of Mozambique have faced oppression and social spatial segregation and responded in a way that has reinforced rather than dismantled their traditional values. Since pre-colonial times, the population’s strategy for escaping from environmental and foreign political disruption has been to reinvent tradition, based on the principles of resilience, resistance and self-reliance. The development of decentralised human settlements, involving the appropriation of land for domestic space and the self-organisation of neighbourhoods, were strategies to protect communities from adversity and secure collective self-reliance.
Following Mozambique’s conversion to globalization, the post-colonial ‘cement city’ is now the core of neo-liberalism, as a node of the global economy, where foreign donors and international market economy control national political economy, exacerbating the premise of the negation of self-sufficiency that continues to evolve resiliently at its margins. The adoption of a neo-liberal model of development during the 1990s, completely bypasses the realities of Mozambican society. This paper argues that the strategy of self-production of space regarding the household/Outdoor Domestic Space unit, which existed previously as a resistance strategy, first of all against colonialism and secondly, against the statist definition of socialism, thirdly, has become a successful strategy for survival, as the building block of the decentralised Agrocity, in the face of a global economy which totally neglects both the people and the land.
Outdoor Domestic Space is a multifaceted space that refers to the external space surrounding the built house and which, in the case of Mozambique, is where daily life takes place, involving strong social, ecological and productive functions. Under successive periods of political economy oppression and environmental adversity, the Outdoor Domestic Space has been adapted and refined to ensure collective self-reliance. Shaping a green and ruralised urbanisation at the margins of the Mozambican post-colonial dualistic city, which I call the Agrocity, the Outdoor Domestic Space is resilient because it is able to adjust domestic space as a strategy to secure livelihoods, provide urban food, commerce and services, maintain vital kinship relationships and produce a comfortable and clean microclimate across the spontaneous neighbourhoods. This spatial resilience is the feature underlying the self-organisation of neighbourhoods with a new way of overcoming alienation from nature, which suggest the continuance of an innate relationship between society, the human habitat and nature.Downloads
References
AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK (2007) “African Development Report 2007 - natural resources for sustainable development in Africa”, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
ALLEN, Peter M. (1997) “Cities and Regions as Self-Organizing Systems: models of complexity”, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Amsterdam.
BOKO, M., I. Niang, A. Nyong, C. Vogel, A. Githeko, M. Medany, B. Osman-Elasha, R. Tabo and P. Yanda (2007) “Africa, Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability”, Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, M. L. Parry, O. F. Canziani, J. P. Palutikof, P. J. van der Linden and C. E. Hanson (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, 433-467.
BRAFMAN, Ori and Rod A. Beckstrom (2006) “The Starfish and the Spider: the unstoppable power of leaderless organizations”, Penguin Group, London.
BRUSCHI, Sandro, J. Carrilho and L. Lage (2005) “Era uma vez uma palhota… história da casa Moçambicana”, Edições FAPF-UEM, Maputo.
GARLAKE, Peter (1973) “Great Zimbabwe”, New Aspects of Antiquity, Thames & Hudson, London.
GIRARDET, H. (1996) “The Gaia Atlas of Cities: new directions for sustainable urban living”, A Gaia Original, Gaia Books Limited, London.
GUEDES, Amâncio d’Alpoim (1971) “The Caniços of Mozambique”, in Oliver, Paul, 1976, Shelter in Africa, Barrie and Jenkins, London, 200-209.
HARDOY, J. E., D. Mitlin and D. Satterthwaite (2001) “Environmental problems in an urbanizing world: finding solutions in Africa, Asia and Latin America”, Earthscan, London.
INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTATÍSTICA (2007) “Census 2007, Sistema Estatístico Nacional de Moçambique” [www.ine.gov.mz] (last assessed in January 2009).
JOSS, S. (2010) “Eco-cities: a global survey 2009” in C.A.Brebbia, S. Hernandez and E. Tezzi (eds.) The Sustainable City VI: Urban Regeneration and Sustainability, WIT Press, Southampton, 239-250.
LOVELOCK, James (1979) “Gaia: a new look at life on Earth”, Popular Science, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
MARX, Karl (1973) “Grundrisse: foundations of the critique of political economy”, Penguin in association with New Left Review, Harmondsworth.
NEWIT, Malyn (1997) “A history of Mozambique”, Hurst & Company, London.
O’CONNOR, Anthony (1983) “The African City”, Hutchinson University Library for Africa, London.
RAPOSO, Isabel (1988) “Do habitat disperso às “aldeias comunais”. A transformação do habitat rural em Moçambique/Os camponeses e o Estado/Vilanculos”, Sociedade e Território: revista de estudos urbanos e regionais, Ano 3, Julho, 106-121.
RITA-FERREIRA, António (1999) “African kingdoms and alien settlements in Central Mozambique: (c. 15th-17th cent.)”, Publicações do Centro de Estudos Africanos, Departamento de Antropologia, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra.
SCHMIDT, Alfred (1971) “The Concept of Nature in Marx”, NLB, London.
SHELDON, Kathleen E. (1999) “Machambas in the City: Urban Women and Agricultural Work in Mozambique”, Lusotopie, 121-140.
SHELDON, Kathleen E. (2003) “Markets and Gardens: Placing Women in the History of Urban Mozambique”, Canadian Journal of African Studies/Revue Canadienne des Études Africaines, Vol. 37, Nº2/3, 358-395.
VERISSIMO, Céline (2010) “Dondo Fieldwork Report”, Unpublished Report, Development Planning Unit, UCL (June).
Copyright (c) 2014 Tema. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following:
1. Authors retain the rights to their work and give in to the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution that allows others to share the work indicating the authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors can adhere to other agreements of non-exclusive license for the distribution of the published version of the work (ex. To deposit it in an institutional repository or to publish it in a monography), provided to indicate that the document was first published in this journal.
3. Authors can distribute their work online (ex. In institutional repositories or in their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and it can increase the quotations of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access)