Resilience? Insights into the role of Critical Infrastructures Disaster Mitigation Strategies
Abstract
Critical infrastructures (CI) systems provide essential services “for the maintenance of critical societal functions, including the supply chain, health, safety, security and economic or social well-being of the people” (European Commission, 2008). These systems are exposed to a great number of hazards and threats, which may result in severe consequences for the population, the socio-economic system, and the environment. The issue is particularly relevant at urban level, where the disruption of one CI system can propagate to the other systems and paralyze the entire area. It is therefore necessary, not only to protect CIs through Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) strategies, but also to enhance the resilience of these areas. This article aims thus at providing some insights related to the evolution of the critical infrastructures disaster mitigation strategies from the sole protection towards resilience: what kind of strategies based on resilience can be developed to address CIs disruption at local or regional level? To what extent do these strategies contribute to increase the resilience level of the entire urban or metropolitan area?
The first section focuses on the urban critical infrastructures systems as well as on the way their disruption can impact urban areas. The second section provides with some examples of key measures to operationalize resilience in the field of critical infrastructure disaster mitigation strategies. The last section highlights how the key measures developed to enhance the resilience against CI disruptions can benefit also to broader urban resilience.
Downloads
References
BBC News (2009), Political fallout of Bulgaria's gas crisis, 9 January 2009, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7820252.stm accessed 10 June, 2012.
Bouchon, S. Dimauro, C. Trucco, P. (Eds) (2012), Proceedings of the 1st International workshop on Regional Critical Infrastructure Protection Programmes: Main issues, Experiences and Challenges, Milan, 17-18 November 2011, Organised by the Lombardy Region Public Administration, Civil Protection, Local Police Coordination and Safety Unit and Eupolis Lombardia, Milan, May 2012.
Bouchon, S. Di Mauro, C. Logtmeijer, C. Nordvik, J-P. Pride, R. Schupp, B. Thornton, M., (2008), Non-Binding Guidelines - For application of the Council Directive on the identification and designation of European Critical Infrastructure and the assessment of the need to improve their protection, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen, JRC 48985, EUR 23665 EN, ISSN 1018-5593, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, European Communities
Bouchon, S. (2006), The Vulnerability of interdependent Critical Infrastructures Systems: Epistemological and Conceptual State of the Art, Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen, Joint Research Centre, European Commission.
Cagno, Enrico, De Ambroggi Massimiliano, Trucco, Paolo (2011). Interdependency analysis of CIs in real scenarios, Proceedings of ESREL 2011 - Advances in Safety, Reliability and Risk Management, Bérenguer, Grall & Guedes Soares (eds), pp. 2508-2514, Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-68379-1.
Cleeland, B. (2009), The Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) Epidemic in the United Kingdom, International Risk Governance Council, Geneva, Switzerland.
Cloutier, I. (2011), “A collaborative approach to interdependency analysis of regional CI”, in Bouchon, S. Dimauro, C. Trucco, P. (Eds) (2012), Proceedings of the 1st International workshop on Regional Critical Infrastructure Protection Programmes: Main issues, Experiences and Challenges, Milan, 17-18 November 2011, Organised by the Lombardy Region Public Administration, Civil Protection, Local Police Coordination and Safety Unit and Eupolis Lombardia, Milan, May 2012.
European Commission (2008), “Council Directive 2008/114/EC of 8 December 2008 on the identification and designation of European critical infrastructures and the assessment of the need to improve their protection”, Official Journal L 345 , 23/12/2008 P. 0075 – 0082.
FEMA (2011). A Whole Community Approach to Emergency Management: Principles, Themes, and Pathways for Action, 28p. http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=4941
Gheorghe, A. Schlaepfer, M. (2004), Critical Infrastructures. Ubiquity of Digitalization and Risks of Independent Critical Infrastructures, Joint IRGC-ETH final edition, Working Paper, Zurich 2005, CH.
Holling C.S. (1973), “Resilience and stability of ecological systems“, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, n°4, pp.1-23.
Kitamura, M. (2011), “Keynote Speech: Critical infrastructure recovery and lessons learned from the 2011 earthquake disaster in Japan”, in Bouchon, S. Dimauro, C. Trucco, P. (Eds) (2012), Proceedings of the 1st International workshop on Regional Critical Infrastructure Protection Programmes: Main issues, Experiences and Challenges, Milan, 17-18 November 2011, Organised by the Lombardy Region Public Administration, Civil Protection, Local Police Coordination and Safety Unit and Eupolis Lombardia, Milan, May 2012.
Kröger, W. (2008), “Critical infrastructures at risk: A need for a new conceptual approach and extended analytical tools”, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Volume 93, Issue 12, December 2008, Pages 1781–1787
Metropolis (2011), Managing Urban Growth, Commission 2 Report, Metropolis, World Association of the Major Metropolises First edition, March 2011, Barcelona (Spain)
Pandolfi, J., Bradbury. R. Sala. E. Hughes. P. Bjorndal. K. Cooke. R. McArdle. D. McClenachan. L. Newman. J. Paredes. G. Warner. R and Jackson J (2003) ‘Global Trajectories of the Longterm Decline of Coral Reef Ecosystems’. Science. 301, pp. 955-958.
Peters R. (2011). “Integrating CI Interdependencies and cascading effects mitigation into planning and preparedness activities” in Bouchon, S. Dimauro, C. Trucco, P. (Eds) (2012), Proceedings of the 1st International workshop on Regional Critical Infrastructure Protection Programmes: Main issues, Experiences and Challenges, Milan, 17-18 November 2011, Organised by the Lombardy Region Public Administration, Civil Protection, Local Police Coordination and Safety Unit and Eupolis Lombardia, Milan, May 2012.
Petrenj, Boris, Lettieri Emanuele, Trucco, Paolo (2011). Towards enhanced collaboration and information sharing for Critical Infrastructure resilience: Current barriers and emerging capabilities, 4th Annual Conference on Next Generation Infrastructures (NGInfra2011), Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia (USA), November 16-18.
Provan KG., Kennis P. (2008). “Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Volume 18, Issue 2, Pp. 229-252
Regione Lombardia (2012) PReSIC - Programma Regionale per la Collaborazione ed il Coordinamento nella Sicurezza delle Infrastrutture Critiche, http://www.protezionecivile.regione.lombardia.it/
Resilience Alliance (2007), Urban Resilience - A Resilience Alliance Initiative for Transitioning Urban Systems towards Sustainable Futures, February 2007, http://www.resalliance.org/index.php/urban_resilience.
Richardson, G. (2002) “The Metatheory of Resilience and Resiliency”, Journal of Clinical Psychology. 58(3). pp. 307–321.
Ritter S., Weber J. (2004). Critical Infrastructure Protection: Survey of world-wide Activities. Federal Office for Information Security, Bonn, March, 2004. Vol.6. Number 1/2010, pp.17-30
Robert B., Morabito L. (2010). “An approach to identifying geographic interdependencies among critical infrastructures”, International Journal of Critical Infrastructures,
Scalingi, P. (2011), “Federal, State and regional strategies for CI and KRSC protection in the US” in Bouchon, S. Dimauro, C. Trucco, P. (Eds) (2012), Proceedings of the 1st International workshop on Regional Critical Infrastructure Protection Programmes: Main issues, Experiences and Challenges, Milan, 17-18 November 2011, Organised by the Lombardy Region Public Administration, Civil Protection, Local Police Coordination and Safety Unit and Eupolis Lombardia, Milan, May 2012.
The Scottish Government (2011), Secure and resilient: a strategic framework for critical national infrastructure in scotland”, http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2011/03/21095856/0
Sutter, M. (2011), “PPP models for CIP implementation at regional level”, in the US” in Bouchon, S. Dimauro, C. Trucco, P. (Eds) (2012), Proceedings of the 1st International workshop on Regional Critical Infrastructure Protection Programmes: Main issues, Experiences and Challenges, Milan, 17-18 November 2011, Organised by the Lombardy Region Public Administration, Civil Protection, Local Police Coordination and Safety Unit and Eupolis Lombardia, Milan, May 2012.
The Infrastructure Security Partnership (TISP) (2006), Regional Disaster Resilience: A Guide for Developing an Action Plan, The Infrastructure Security Partnership, ASCE the American Society of Civil Engineers 2006, Reston, Virginia, USA, ISBN 0-7844-0880-7
Trucco, Paolo, Cagno, Enrico, De Ambroggi, Massimiliano (2011). “Dynamic Functional Modelling of Vulnerability and Interoperability of Critical Infrastructures”, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2011. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2011.12.003
Urqhart, J. (2011), “Integration of national and regional CIP policies: experience of the Scottish Government”, in the US” in Bouchon, S. Dimauro, C. Trucco, P. (Eds) (2012), Proceedings of the 1st International workshop on Regional Critical Infrastructure Protection Programmes: Main issues, Experiences and Challenges, Milan, 17-18 November 2011, Organised by the Lombardy Region Public Administration, Civil Protection, Local Police Coordination and Safety Unit and Eupolis Lombardia, Milan, May 2012.
Van Der Leeuw, S.E. (2001). “Vulnerability' and the Integrated Study of Socio-Natural Phenomena”, IHDP Update 2:8-11
Copyright (c) 2014 Tema. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following:
1. Authors retain the rights to their work and give in to the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution that allows others to share the work indicating the authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors can adhere to other agreements of non-exclusive license for the distribution of the published version of the work (ex. To deposit it in an institutional repository or to publish it in a monography), provided to indicate that the document was first published in this journal.
3. Authors can distribute their work online (ex. In institutional repositories or in their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and it can increase the quotations of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access)