For a Safer City. And Friendly. And More Beautiful.

  • Roberto Busi DICATA


For many years the security of mobility in the city has been considered as a crucial social subject because of the high number of the victims and, more generally, of its impact on the life conditions in the city. The above-said subject, indeed, if rightly set out, shows important and basic implications regarding the quality of urban life, since the citizen – and the weak user of the road in particular - is strongly limited in the use of urban public spaces. Besides, those spaces are a basic element of the city structure: in fact from ancient times the city has been considered mainly for its attitude to allow social relationships. And that can be achieved only if the urban public spaces are fit for it, as regards quantity but above all as regards quality. Consequently, there is an increasing attention to acquire methods, techniques and strategies to face the planning, building and management of roads, squares and urban green areas (mainly according to the logic of recovering the historic and consolidated city) aiming at making citizens fully use the city. The subject is on the agenda of those Countries which pay more attention to social questions and of consequence, in a laudable way, to the real quality of urban places, meant as spaces with high functional level mainly targeted to people aggregation as well as to outdoor activities in general. Therefore, the subject itself is an opportunity of reconstituting the urban and regional planning discipline (and, generally speaking, of the city’s disciplines) starting from the renewed interest in the public spaces. That is the most significant and expressive meaning of the term “friendly city”, which really highlights the target of security connected with that of the effective usability of urban environment. The subject will acquire then a further value if it includes also the territorial dimension. The soft mobility (i.e. pedestrian and cycle)strongly affects the long distances too, involving also the extra-urban ambit. As regards this, the lay-outs of historic roads can be effectively utilized, if they are still in use, by making restricted interventions. An example of that is given by the towpaths of (natural and artificial) streams and sites of vacant railway stations. The report deals with the above mentioned statements and introduces supporting elements and examples, with reference also to the implications on urban landscape. On the one hand, the city looks prettier when interventions are carried out to re-qualify public spaces, which produce non banal aesthetic improvements too. On the other hand, above all, the possibility of moving slowly, on foot or by bicycle, allows to perceive the complexity of urban and territorial landscape in its composition of several visual plans and components, which otherwise would be impossible.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Roberto Busi, DICATA
Full professor of Technical and urban Planning at the University of Brescia. Director of the Department of Civil Engineering, Architecture, Territory and Environment and of the Centro Studi Città Amica. He coordinates the Research Doctorate in Places and Time of City and Territory. He has always investigated environmental subjects linked to city and territory. He has also dealt with the security of the pedestrians in urban environment according to the re-qualification of public open spaces.
How to Cite
BusiR. (2009). For a Safer City. And Friendly. And More Beautiful. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 2(2).