Soils’ tales, recycling beyond death. The Parco Cimiteriale di Poggioreale towards possible extensions
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper presents the results of a research carried out in Belgium, France, Holland and United States about the destiny – foreseeable or possible – of heterotopias, a huge 19th and 20th centuries architectonic and cultural estate heritage.
The twentieth-century city was built through the addition of different settlements, which were strongly functionally defined and laid out. The heterotopias of deviation were built among the elements composing a “city of enclosures”.
The earth, beginning and ending of each thing, is saturated: even its underground is saturated and its layers have absorbed dross and wastes of all kinds. In metropolitan territories, there is a continuous production of waste.
To the larger and larger production of waste an answer is given by previsions that tend to consider re-cycling phases of different kind, flexible and long-lasting times and procedures, possibly first temporary and then permanent.
This research has helped defining a project proposed as an alternative to the II Stralcio Funzionale of the P.U.A. for the cemetery system of Poggioreale in Naples. The proposed alternative consists in extending the Parco Cimiteriale di Poggioreale into the former psychiatric asylum Leonardo Bianchi in Naples.
By adopting densifying, recycling, mixing functions as main criteria for a project related to a huge legacy of both material and immaterial kind of heritage, the “T’era Park” proposal aims to enhance the “notes from underground”.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Berger, A. (2007). Drosscape: Wasting Land in Urban America. New York, US: Princeton Architectural Press.
Bertolaccini, L. (2005). La formazione storica del cimitero moderno. In G. Strappa (Ed.), Edilizia per il culto: chiese, moschee, sinagoghe, strutture cimiteriali. Torino, IT: UTET.
Bruni, F., & D’Agostino, A. (2004). Le occasioni della città. Eventi straordinari e trasformazioni urbane. Napoli, IT: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.
D’Agostino, A., & Vannelli, G. (2018). Da città dell’esclusione all’inclusione di città. Il caso degli ex ospedali psichiatrici. In F. Capano, M.I. Pascariello & M. Visone (Eds.), La città altra/The other city. Storia e immagine della diversità urbana: luoghi e paesaggi dei privilegi e del benessere, dell’isolamento, del disagio, della multiculturalità. Napoli, IT: fedOA Press. doi: 10.6093/978-88-99930-03-5
D’Ambra, R. (1845). Gli odierni Camposanti napoletani. Napoli, IT.
De Leo, E. (2006). Paesaggi cimiteriali europei. Lastscape realtà e tendenze. Roma, IT: Mancosu editore.
Delbaere, D. (2017). Comme au ciel: le paysage et le sacré. Les carnets du paysage, 31.
Felicori, M. (Ed.). (2005). Gli spazi della memoria. Architettura dei cimiteri monumentali europei. Roma, IT: Luca Sossella Editore.
Foucault, M. (2001). Spazi altri. In S. Vaccaro (Ed.), Spazi altri. I luoghi delle eterotopie. Udine, IT: Mimesis Edizioni.
Giordano, P. (2006). Il disegno dell’Architettura Funebre. Napoli Poggioreale, il Cimitero delle 366 fosse e il Sepolcreto dei Colerici. Firenze, IT: Alinea.
Gregotti, V. (1984). Modificazione. Casabella, 498-499.
Koolhaas, R. & Boom, I., (2014). Fundamentals, Catalogo della XIV Mostra Internazionale di Architettura di Venezia. Venezia, IT: Marsilio.
Mangone, F. (Ed.). (2004). Cimiteri Napoletani. Storia, arte e cultura. Napoli, IT: Massa Editore.
Mascilli Migliorini, P. (2004). Le urne dei deboli. Le origini del cimitero di Poggioreale a Napoli. In F. Mangone (Ed.), Cimiteri Napoletani. Storia, arte e cultura. Napoli, IT: Massa Editore.
Masullo, A. (2004). L’eloquente artificio della memoria e la silenziosa emozione del ricordo. In F. Mangone (Ed.), Cimiteri Napoletani. Storia, arte e cultura. Napoli, IT: Massa Editore.
Menzietti, G. (2016). Resto. In S. Marini & G. Corbellini (Eds.), Recycled Theory: Illustrated Dictionary. Macerata, IT: Quodlibet.
Piano Urbanistico Attuativo. Parco Cimiteriale di Poggioreale. Retrieved from:
http://www.comune.napoli.it/flex/cm/pages/ServeBLOB.php/L/IT/IDPagina/29665
Ricci, M. (2012). Nuovi paradigmi. Trento, IT: List.
Rossi, A. (2011). L’architettura della città. Macerata, IT: Quodlibet. [first pubblished in 1966]
Rothstein, K. (2016). Constellation Park, Pasajes arquitectura, 141.
Sasso, C.N. (1858). Storia de’ Monumenti di Napoli e degli architetti che li edificavano dal 1801 al 1851, II vol. Napoli.
Secchi, R. (2016). Scarto. In S. Marini & G. Corbellini (Eds.), Recycled Theory: Illustrated Dictionary. Macerata, IT: Quodlibet.
Strappa, G. (2005). Generalità. In G. Strappa (Ed.), Edilizia per il culto: chiese, moschee, sinagoghe, strutture cimiteriali. Torino, IT: UTET.
Vannelli, G. (2019). T’era Park: un catalogo di strategie possibili per le memorie delle eterotopie di Napoli Est. In G. Driussi (Ed.), Il patrimonio culturale in mutamento. Le sfide dell’uso. Venezia, IT: Edizioni Arcadia Ricerche.