Main Article Content
The paper deals with the theme of the temporary uses of public space related to bottom-up actions, with the aim of obtaining adaptive and resilient strategies for planning and designing the contemporary city which is currently characterized by uncertainty and scarcity of resources.
On the other side, the paper reflects on the risk of a possible ideological drift towards a model of “city on demand", related to episodic urban transformations not supported by a wider vision.
The paper prospects a complementarity of top-down strategies, planned from above, and bottom-up tactics, identifying a possible synergy in the intermediate scale of urban regeneration projects.
Overcoming the idea of a "populist" urbanism, which sees the uselessness of the urban planner, we try to define a new role of the urban designer as a strategist, who has the ability to prefigure scenarios as well as to configure inclusive spaces for people.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Bishop, P., Williams, L. (2012). The Temporary City. London: Routledge.
Boonstra B., Bolens L. (2011). Self-organization in urban development: toward a new perspective on spatial planning. Urban Research & Practice, 4(2), 99-122. doi:10.1080/17535069.2011.579767
Clemente, M. (2017). Re-design dello spazio pubblico. Milano: FrancoAngeli
Colomb, C. (2012). Pushing the Urban Frontier: Temporary Uses of Space, City Marketing, and the Creative City Discourse in 2000S Berlin. Journal of Urban Affairs, 34(2). doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9906.2012.00607.x
De Certau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Donovan, F. (2014). DIY urbanism: implications for cities. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability. 7(4), 381-398. doi:10.1080/ 17549175. 2014. 891149
Douglas, G. (2014). Do-It-Yourself urban design: the social practice of informal “improvement” through unauthorized alteration. City & Community. 13(1), 5-25. doi: 10.1111/cico.12029
Garcia, A., Lydon, M. (2015). Tactical urbanism, Short term action for long-term change, Washington DC: Island Press.
Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for People, Washington DC: Island Press.
Haydn, F., Temel, R. (2006). Temporary Urban Spaces: Concepts for the Use of the City Spaces. Basel: Birkhauser.
Kitsinger, A. (2014). “Tactical Urbanism” or Public vandalism? PlannersWeb. News & Information for Citizen Planner. http://plannersweb.com/2014/01/tactical-urbanism-public-vandalism/
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford, UK & Cambridge, USA: Blackwell.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The critique of everyday life. Verso: New York.
Project for Public Spaces (2001). How to Turn a Place Around: A Handbook for Creating Successful Public Spaces. Project for Public Places. New York City, NY
Sawhney, N., de Klerk, C., & Malhotra, S. (2015). Civic Engagement through DIY Urbanism and Collective Net-worked Action. Planning Practice & Research. 30(3), 337-354. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2015.1054662
Schaller, S., Guinand, S. (2018). Pop-up landscapes: a new trigger to push up land value? Urban Geography. 39(1), 54-74. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2016.1276719
Stickells, L. (2012). The right to the city, Rethinking architecture’s social significance. Architectural Review. 16(3), 213-227. doi: 10.1080/13264826.2011.628633
Silva, P. (2016). Tactical urbanism: Towards an evolutionary cities’ approach? Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 43(6), 1040-1051. doi: 10.1177/0265813516657340
Whyte, W.H. (1980). The social life of small urban places. Project for Public Space.