Sustainable urban regeneration: designing and planning for unpredictability

Main Article Content

Alessandro Sgobbo

Abstract

The disciplinary debate of urban planner scientific community focus today on urban regeneration, stimulated by the pursuit of multiple objectives: ecological sustainability, social inclusiveness and resilience are probably the ones that most arouse the interest of urban planners. However, we register a prolificacy of meanings for urban regeneration that is often confused with building maintenance and adaptation. This is not necessarily wrong but, in a period of public budget restriction, the simply not focusing on primary objectives often hinders the much more necessary processes of intimate transformation of urban fabric and of functions which are central in urban regeneration.
Nevertheless, in the last twenty years, the Italian legislator has exploited this ambiguity and preferred to concentrate the available resources on interventions on a building scale rather than properly on an urban scale. There are many reasons underlying this choice. Certainly, the distrust in the urban planning procedures, which are considered too long, uncertain and do not give immediate electoral consensus, seems to be the main. From this evidence emerges the reflection on the need to rethink the legislative framework of urban planning as an indispensable condition for the start of a season of real regeneration of urban settlements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
SgobboA. (2022). Sustainable urban regeneration: designing and planning for unpredictability. UPLanD - Journal of Urban Planning, Landscape & Environmental Design, 6(1), 59-66. https://doi.org/10.6093/2531-9906/9708
Section
Articles

References

Atkinson, R. (2004). The evidence on the impact of gentrification: new lessons for the urban renaissance?. European journal of housing policy, 4(1), 107-131.

Ayouba, K., Breuillé, M. L., Grivault, C., & Le Gallo, J. (2020). Does Airbnb disrupt the private rental market? An empirical analysis for French cities. International Regional Science Review, 43(1-2), 76-104.

Bassolino, E., D’Ambrosio, V., & Sgobbo, A. (2021). Data Exchange Processes for the Definition of Climate-Proof Design Strategies for the Adaptation to Heatwaves in the Urban Open Spaces of Dense Italian Cities. Sustainability, 13(10), 5694.

Bencardino, M. (2015). Consumo di suolo e sprawl urbano. Bollettino della Società Geografica Italiana, 8, 217-237.

Campos Venuti, G. (1988). La terza generazione dell’urbanistica. Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Cappiello, V. (2017). Terraced Landscapes. The “Penisola Sorrentino – Amalfitana” Case. UPLanD – Journal of Urban Planning, Landscape & environmental Design, 2(2), 299-318.

Colacicco, P., Greco, F., & Rotondo, F. (2021). Il Piano casa: evitare l’urbanistica è la soluzione?. Territorio, 97(2), 162-181.

Colsaet, A., Laurans, Y., & Levrel, H. (2018). What drives land take and urban land expansion? A systematic review. Land Use Policy, 79, 339-349.

Coppola, A. & Coppola, M. (2022). Semplificazione edilizia, rigenerazione urbana e riqualificazione del patrimonio edilizio esistente in Campania. Commento analitico, articolo per articolo, alla legge regionale n. 13 del 10 agosto 2022, pubblicata sul B.U.R.C. n. 70 del 10 agosto 2022. Brienza: Le Penseur.

De Luca, G., & Lingua, V. (2010). Dimensionamento dei piani e controllo del consumo di suolo: l’area vasta come dimensione pertinente. In C. Perrone & J. Zetti, (Eds.), Il valore della terra. Teoria e applicazioni per il dimensionamento della pianificazione territoriale, (pp. 277-298). Milano: Franco Angeli.

Della Spina, L., Calabrò, F., Calavita, N., & Meduri, T. (2014). Trasferimento di diritti edificatori come incentivi per la rigenerazione degli insediamenti abusivi. LaborEst, (9), 71-75.

Fabbricatti, K., Picone, A., Tenore, V., Ascione, F., Berruti, G., Formato, E., Mattiucci, C., & Sgobbo, A. (2022). Quality of housing for inner areas between specialised supply, proximity welfare and production of new economies. TECHNE Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment, 12, 187-197.

Fraker, H. (2013). The hidden potential of sustainable neighborhoods: Lessons from low-carbon communities (pp. 150-155). Washington, DC: Island press.

Gasparrini, C. (2011). Vesuvio: la convivenza col rischio. Prisma: economia, società, lavoro, 1, 106-120.

Gisotti, G. (2020). Il dissesto idrogeologico. Previsione, prevenzione e mitigazione del rischio. Palermo: Dario Flaccovio Editore.

Gómez-Baggethun, E., Gren, Å., Barton, D. N., Langemeyer, J., McPhearson, T., O’farrell, P., ... & Kremer, P. (2013). Urban ecosystem services. In Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 175-251). Springer, Dordrecht.

Grimes, O. F. (1976). Housing for low-income urban families: Economics and policy in the developing world. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.

Gurran, N., & Phibbs, P. (2017). When tourists move in: how should urban planners respond to Airbnb?. Journal of the American planning association, 83(1), 80-92.

INU Lombardia (2022). Manifesto per l’urbanistica e Principi e contenuti essenziali della Proposta di Legge nazionale di Riforma del Governo del Territorio. Retrieved from: https://www.inu.it/wp-content/uploads/manifestourbanistica-inu-lombardia.pdf

Karrer, F. (2022). Buildings, city and territory between real complexity and decision-making reductivism. TECHNE-Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment, 21-25.

Laino, G. (2009). Innovazione delle politiche per l'abitare: una strategia enzimatica per il programma di recupero dei bassi di Napoli. Archivio di studi urbani e regionali, 96, 206-223.

Lee, G. K., & Chan, E. H. (2008). The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach for assessment of urban renewal proposals. Social indicators research, 89(1), 155-168.

Lees, L., Slater, T., & Wyly, E. (2013). Gentrification. London: Routledge.

Marta, M. (2010). Rischi e potenzialità ambientali per la città in crisi. Semestrale di Studi e Ricerche di Geografia,1, 73-90.

Mattarella, B.G. (2007). Il diritto dell’onestà. Etica pubblica e pubblici funzionari. Il Mulino, 2007(1), 35-44.

Moccia, F. D. (2009). L’urbanistica nella fase dei cambiamenti climatici. Urbanistica, 140, 95.

Moccia, F.D. (2021). La forma di piano per le esigenze d’oggi. BDC. Bollettino Del Centro Calza Bini, 21(1), 45-65.

Moccia, F.D., & Sgobbo, A. (2017). Città Metropolitana di Napoli. In F.D. Moccia & G. De Luca (eds.), Pianificare le città metropolitane in Italia. Interpretazioni, approcci, prospettive (pp. 289-326). Roma: INU Edizioni.

Montedoro, L., & Russo, M. (Eds.) (2022). Fare urbanistica oggi: Le culture del progetto. Roma: Donzelli Editore.

Moroni, S. (2000). Riflessioni sulla razionalità di piano a partire dal tradizionale problema del fabbisogno abitativo. Archivio di studi urbani e regionali, 67.

Porter, L., & Shaw, K. (Eds.). (2013). Whose Urban Renaissance?: An international comparison of urban regeneration strategies. Routledge.

Roberts, P., & Sykes, H. (Eds.). (1999). Urban regeneration: a handbook. London: Sage.

Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Storper, M. (2020). Housing, urban growth and inequalities: The limits to deregulation and upzoning in reducing economic and spatial inequality. Urban Studies, 57(2), 223-248.

Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytical hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Saaty, T. L. (1995). Decision making for leaders: The analytic hierarchy process for decisions in a complex world. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.

Sgobbo, A. (2016). La città che si sgretola: nelle politiche urbane ed economiche le risorse per un’efficace manutenzione. BDC. Bollettino Del Centro Calza Bini, 16(1), 155-175.

Sgobbo, A. (2017). Eco-social innovation for efficient urban metabolisms. TECHNE Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment, 14, 337-344.

Sgobbo, A. (2018). Resilienza e rigenerazione: l’approccio water sensitive urban planning come strategia di sostenibilità urbana. BDC. Bollettino Del Centro Calza Bini, 18(1), 105-126.

Sgobbo, A. (2018). The Value of Water: an Opportunity for the Eco-Social Regeneration of Mediterranean Metropolitan Areas. In F. Calabrò, L. Della Spina, C. Bevilacqua (Eds), New Metropolitan Perspectives. Local Knowledge and Innovation Dynamics Towards Territory Attractiveness Through the Implementation of Horizon/E2020/Agenda2030. vol 2 (pp. 505-512). Cham: Springer.

Sgobbo, A. (2018). Water Sensitive Urban Planning. Approach and opportunities in Mediterranean metropolitan areas. Roma: INU Edizioni.

Sgobbo, A. (2020). Inspiring & Training Energy-Spatial Socioeconomic Sustainability. SMC – Sustainable Mediterranean Construction, 12, 138-143.

Sgobbo, A. (2021). Politiche insediative e sostenibilità urbana. BDC. Bollettino Del Centro Calza Bini, 21(1), 19-44.

Sgobbo, A. (2021). Sostenibilità ecologica e resilienza: la strategia densità/densificazione. In P. La Greca, A. Sgobbo, F.D. Moccia (Eds.), Urban Density & Sustainability (pp. 151-170). Santarcangelo di Romagna: Maggioli Editore.

Sgobbo, A. (2021). Sustainable Planning: The Carrying Capacity Approach. In C. Bevilacqua, F. Calabrò, L. Della Spina (Eds.), New Metropolitan Perspectives. NMP 2020. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 178. Cham: Springer.

Sgobbo, A., & Moccia, F.D. (2016). Synergetic Temporary Use for the Enhancement of Historic Centers: The Pilot Project for the Naples Waterfront. TECHNE Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment, 12, 253-260.

Stangherlin, B., Arena, A., & Mollura, G. (2014). Il progetto Sirena a Napoli 2002-2012: una esperienza realizzata per la riqualificazione urbana. Urbanistica Informazioni, 255, 68-77.

Tallon, A. (2020). Urban Regeneration in the UK. London: Routledge.

Tosi, A. (2016). Le case dei poveri. È ancora possibile pensare un welfare abitativo?. Sesto San Giovanni, IT: Mimesis.

Tosi, A. (2018). Alla ricerca di un welfare abitativo in Europa. Rivista delle politiche sociali, 4, 43-58.

Zipp, S. (2013). The roots and routes of urban renewal. Journal of Urban History, 39(3), 366-391.