User-centred mobility management and social inclusion. Urban insights from the University of Genoa
Abstract
Although constituting one of the basic individual rights, mobility has been considered for long a given service users should adapt to. Nevertheless, increasing customization needs have recently emerged, so that user-centered paradigm has progressively gained relevance. Demand-Responsive-Transport, as well as Mobility-as-a-Service solutions are often introduced to meet specifical users’ groups and targets transport demand. Contemporary individual needs require to shape indeed mobility services and respective management strategies within a wider welfare perspective, in order to assure universal access to facilities and opportunities. Thus representing a quite critical challenge on a urban level, Universities may constitute an interesting case-study to develop integrated strategies addressing accessibility, inclusion and equality within a more limited, though comprehensive community. Present contribution will therefore provide an holistic methodological approach to support sustainable and inclusive mobility management planning and actions, starting from the University of Genoa experience, currently implementing dedicated tools and strategies, thus investigating potential extension to Genoese urban context.
Downloads
References
Aarhaug, J. (2019). Universal design as a way of thinking about mobility. In: Müller, B., Meyer, G. (Eds.) Towards User-Centric Transport in Europe. Lecture Notes in Mobility. Switzerland: Springer, Cham.
Altun, G. & Zencirkıran, M. (2023). Evaluation of sustainability of university campuses. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 16 (2), 425-439. https://doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/9916
Andújar-Montoya, M. D. (2016). Improving urban accessibility: A methodology for urban dynamics analysis in smart, sustainable and inclusive cities. Urban Regeneration & Sustainability, 1, 506-513. https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V12-N3-357-367
Biazzo, I., Monechi, B., & Loreto, V. (2019). General scores for accessibility and inequality measures in urban areas. Royal Society open science, 6 (8), 190979. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190979
Brown, D., McGranahan, G., & Dodman, D. (2014). Urban informality and building a more inclusive, resilient and green economy. International Institute for Environment and Development. ISBN 978-1-78431-124-7.
Burlando, C. & Cusano, I. (2018). Growing Old and Keep Mobile in Italy. Active Ageing and the Importance of Urban Mobility Planning Strategies. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 43-52. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/5756
Callegati, F., Giallorenzo, S., Melis, A., & Prandini, M. (2016). Insider Threats in Emerging Mobility-as-a-Service Scenarios. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1609.06447
Cañibano, C., Fox, M. F., & Otamendi, F. J. (2016). Gender and patterns of temporary mobility among researchers. Science and Public Policy, 43 (3), 320-331. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scv042
Cappelletti, G. M., Grilli, L., Russo, C., & Santoro, D. (2021). Sustainable mobility in Universities: The case of the University of Foggia (italy). Environments, 8 (6), 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments8060057
Cherrier, S. & Ghamri-Doudane, Y. M. (2014). The “object-as-a-service” paradigm. Proceedings of 2014 Global Information Infrastructure and Networking Symposium (GIIS), 1-7. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/GIIS.2014.6934281
Cresswell, T. & Uteng, T. P. (2016). Gendered mobilities: towards an holistic understanding. In T. Cresswell & T. P. Uteng (Eds.) Gendered mobilities, 1-12. New York: Routledge.
Dadashzadeh, N., Woods, L., Ouelhadj, D., Thomopoulos, N., Kamargianni, M., & Antoniou, C. (2022). Mobility as a Service Inclusion Index (MaaSINI): Evaluation of inclusivity in MaaS systems and policy recommendations. Transport policy, 127, 191-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.09.006
D'Amico, A. (2023). New frontiers for sustainable mobility: MaaS (Mobility as a Service). TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 16 (2), 455-460. https://doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/10039
Delatte, A., Baouni, T., Belwal, R., Daou, L., Gourram, D., Imam, R., ... & Smadi, A. (2018). Understanding the needs of MENA public transport customers: culture of service and gender responsive recommendations. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 18 (1), 7-30. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/5458
Delponte, I. & Costa, V. (2022). Metropolitan MaaS and DRT Schemes: are they paving the way towards a more inclusive and resilient urban environment? Proceedings of Sixth International Conference on Universal Design Transforming our World through Universal Design for Human Development. ISBN 978-1-64368-305-8.
Di Ciommo, F., Rondinella, G., Foldesi, E., Bánfi, M. G., Giorgi, S., Hueting, R., ... & Keseru, I. (2023). When an Inclusive Universal Design Starts by the Data Collection Methods. Transportation Research Procedia, 72, 2968-2975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2023.11.843
Ding, Y. & Keh, H. T. (2016). A re-examination of service standardization versus customization from the consumer’s perspective. Journal of Services Marketing, 30 (1), 16-28. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-02-2015-0088
Falco, V., Cuntrera, D., & Attanasio, M. (2023). Gender differences in career advancements in Italian universities over the last 20 years. Genus, 79 (1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-023-00189-7
Fol, S. & Gallez, C. (2014). Social inequalities in urban access. Urban access for the 21st century: finance and governance models for transport infrastructure, 46-86. ISBN: 9781315857497.
Fondazione Brodolini (2023). Mobility for all. How to better integrate the gender perspective into transport policy making. Retrieved from: https://www.fondazionebrodolini.it/en/news-and-events/mobility-all-gender-and-transport-policy-making (Accessed: September 15, 2023).
Gauvin, L., Tizzoni, M., Piaggesi, S., Young, A., Adler, N., Verhulst, S., ... & Cattuto, C. (2020). Gender gaps in urban mobility. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7 (1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0500-x
Hidayati, I., Tan, W., & Yamu, C. (2021). Conceptualizing mobility inequality: Mobility and accessibility for the marginalized. Journal of planning literature, 36 (4), 492-507. https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122211012898
ISTAT (2020). Censimento permanente della popolazione in Liguria. Retrieved from: https://www.istat.it/it/files// 2022/03/FOCUS-LIGURIA.pdf (Accessed: September 13, 2023).
Italian Ministries for Ecological Transition, Infrastructures and Sustainable Mobility (2021). Decreto Interministeriale n. 179 del 12 maggio 2021.
Italian Ministry for Ecological Transition (2021). Linee guida per la redazione e l'implementazione dei piani degli spostamenti casa-lavoro (PSCL).
Karvonen, A., Martin, C., & Evans, J. (2018). University campuses as testbeds of smart urban innovation. In A. Karvonen, C. Martin, J. Evans (Eds.), Creating smart cities, 104-118. London: Routledge.
Kostiainen, J. & Tuominen, A. (2019). Mobility as a service—Stakeholders’ challenges and potential implications. Towards user-centric transport in Europe: challenges, solutions and collaborations. Lecture notes in mobility, 239-254. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99756-8
Lee, J. H., Kim, Y. M., Rhiu, I., & Yun, M. H. (2021). A persona-based approach for identifying accessibility issues in elderly and disabled users’ interaction with home appliances. Applied Sciences, 11 (1), 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010368
Lyons, G., Hammond, P., & Mackay, K. (2019). The importance of user perspective in the evolution of MaaS. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 121, 22-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.12.010
Maas, B. (2022). Literature review of mobility as a service. Sustainability, 14(14), 8962. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148962
Macedo, E., Teixeira, J., Gather, M., Hille, C., Will, M. L., Fischer, N., & Bandeira, J. M. (2022). Exploring relevant factors behind a MaaS scheme. Transportation Research Procedia, 62, 607-614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.02.075
Manfredini, F., Lanza, G., & Curci, F. (2023). Mobile phone traffic data for territorial research. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 9-23. https://doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/8892
Marchigiani, E. (2022). An accessible city is a healthy and people-centred smart city. In E. Marchigiani (Eds.), Anthology on Physical and Intellectual Disabilities in an Inclusive Society, 1671-1693. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-3542-7.ch087
Mounce, R., Wright, S., Emele, C. D., Zeng, C., & Nelson, J. D. (2017). A tool to aid redesign of flexible transport services to increase efficiency in rural transport service provision. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 22 (2), 175-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450.2017.1410062
Müller, B. & Meyer, G. (2019). Towards User-Centric Transport in Europe. Switzerland: Springer, Cham.
Munarin, S. & Tosi, M.C. (2012). Spazi del welfare. Esperienze Luoghi Pratiche. Macerata: Quodlibet.
Ng, W. S. & Acker, A. (2018). Understanding urban travel behaviour by gender for efficient and equitable transport policies. International Transport Forum Discussion Paper. https://doi.org/10.1787/eaf64f94-en
Qin, Z. & Fukuda, D. (2023). Use of public transport and social capital building: An empirical study of Japan. Research in Transportation Economics, 99, 101290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2023.101290
Romanowska, A., Okraszewska, R., & Jamroz, K. (2019). A study of transport behaviour of academic communities. Sustainability, 11 (13), 3519. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133519
Rosa, R. & Clavero, S. (2021). Gender equality in higher education and research. Journal of Gender Studies, 31(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2022.2007446
Ryley, T. J., Stanley, P. A., Enoch, M. P., Zanni, A. M., & Quddus, M. A. (2014). Investigating the contribution of Demand Responsive Transport to a sustainable local public transport system. Research in Transportation Economics, 48, 364-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2014.09.064
Schwanen, T., Lucas, K., Akyelken, N., Cisternas Solsona, D., Carrasco, J.A., & Neutens, T. (2015). Rethinking the links between social exclusion and transport disadvantage through the lens of social capital. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 74, 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.02.012
Shrestha, B. P., Millonig, A., Hounsell, N. B., & McDonald, M. (2017). Review of public transport needs of older people in European context. Journal of population ageing, 10, 343-361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-016-9168-9
Trencher, G., Yarime, M., & Kharrazi, A. (2013). Co-creating sustainability: cross-sector university collaborations for driving sustainable urban transformations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.047
Weiss, D. J., Nelson, A., Gibson, H. S., Temperley, W., Peedell, S., Lieber, A., ... & Gething, P. W. (2018). A global map of travel time to cities to assess inequalities in accessibility in 2015. Nature, 553 (7688), 333-336. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25181
Wickham, J. (2006). Public transport systems: The sinews of European urban citizenship?. European Societies, 8 (1), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616690500491464
Xu, Y., Wang, B., Liu, S., Bu, Y., Wang, J., & Liu, R. (2022). Intelligent transportation systems design based on mass customization. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02677-6
Copyright (c) 2024 TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following:
1. Authors retain the rights to their work and give in to the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution that allows others to share the work indicating the authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors can adhere to other agreements of non-exclusive license for the distribution of the published version of the work (ex. To deposit it in an institutional repository or to publish it in a monography), provided to indicate that the document was first published in this journal.
3. Authors can distribute their work online (ex. In institutional repositories or in their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and it can increase the quotations of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access)