The Development of a Walkability Audit. Based on Iranian Cities Pedestrian Environment
Abstract
Given its influence on public health and the vehicle usage and its negative consequences, walkability has attracted much attention in recent decades. Meanwhile, the development of a method to measure walkability of urban areas in order to improve this feature is of utmost importance. Hence, after a comprehensive investigation into environmental measures related to the walking behavior of the users, it was attempted to develop an efficient and reliable environmental audit tool based on these measures. Following the development of a protocol for utilization and management of the tool, two different tests were employed to validate it. The participants were taught how to use the tool, then it was tested in the Eram neighborhood of Shiraz and the results were statistically analyzed. 13 of the environmental measures were found not to have validity to be used in various environments. However, given the remaining 50 items, the tool is valid for being applied to other urban areas.
Downloads
References
Adams, M. A., Frank, L. D., Schipperijn, J., Smith, G., Chapman, J., Christiansen, L. B., & Sallis, J. F. (2014). International variation in neighborhood walkability, transit, and recreation environments using geographic information systems: the IPEN adult study. International Journal of Health Geographics, 13(1), 43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-13-43
Ariffin, R. N. R., & Zahari, R. K. (2013). Perceptions of the Urban Walking Environments. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 105, 589–597. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.062
Austin, D. M., Furr, L. A., & Spine, M. (2002). The effects of neighborhood conditions on perceptions of safety. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30(5), 417–427. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2352(02)00148-4
Brown, B. B., Werner, C. M., Amburgey, J. W., & Szalay, C. (2007). Walkable Route Perceptions and Physical Features: Converging Evidence for En Route Walking Experiences. Environment and Behavior, 39(1), 34–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506295569
Brown, Barbara B., Yamada, I., Smith, K. R., Zick, C. D., Kowaleski-Jones, L., & Fan, J. X. (2009). Mixed land use and walkability: Variations in land use measures and relationships with BMI, overweight, and obesity. Health & Place, 15(4), 1130–1141. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.06.008
Brownson, R. C., Hoehner, C. M., Brennan, L. K., Cook, R. A., Elliott, M. B., & McMullen, K. M. (2004). Reliability of 2 Instruments for Auditing the Environment for Physical Activity. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 1, 191–208. doi: https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.1.3.191
Brownson, R. C., Hoehner, C. M., Day, K., Forsyth, A., & Sallis, J. F. (2009). Measuring the Built Environment for Physical Activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36(4), 99–123. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.005
Carlson, J. A., Sallis, J. F., Conway, T. L., Saelens, B. E., Frank, L. D., Kerr, J., … King, A. C. (2012). Interactions between psychosocial and built environment factors in explaining older adults’ physical activity. Preventive Medicine, 54(1), 68–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.10.004
Cerin, E., Leslie, E., Owen, N., & Bauman, A. (2007). Applying GIS in Physical Activity Research: Community ?Walkability? and Walking Behaviors. In P. C. Lai & A. S. H. Mak (Eds.), GIS for Health and the Environment (pp. 72–89). Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71318-0_6
Chin, G. K. W., Van Niel, K. P., Giles-Corti, B., & Knuiman, M. (2008). Accessibility and connectivity in physical activity studies: The impact of missing pedestrian data. Preventive Medicine, 46(1), 41–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.08.004
Clifton, K. J., Livi Smith, A. D., & Rodriguez, D. (2007). The development and testing of an audit for the pedestrian environment. Landscape and Urban Planning, 80(1–2), 95–110. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.06.008
Day, K., Boarnet, M., Alfonzo, M., & Forsyth, A. (2006a). The Irvine–Minnesota Inventory to Measure Built Environments. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 30(2), 144–152. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.09.017
Day, K., Boarnet, M., Alfonzo, M., & Forsyth, A. (2006b). The Irvine–Minnesota Inventory to Measure Built Environments. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 30(2), 144–152. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.09.017
Doyle, S., Kelly-Schwartz, A., Schlossberg, M., & Stockard, J. (2006). Active Community Environments and Health: The Relationship of Walkable and Safe Communities to Individual Health. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(1), 19–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360608976721
Durand, C. P., Andalib, M., Dunton, G. F., Wolch, J., & Pentz, M. A. (2011). A systematic review of built environment factors related to physical activity and obesity risk: implications for smart growth urban planning: Smart growth urban planning and obesity risk. Obesity Reviews, 12(5), 173–182. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00826.x
Emery, J., Crump, C., & Bors, P. (2003). Reliability and Validity of Two Instruments Designed to Assess the Walking and Bicycling Suitability of Sidewalks and Roads. American Journal of Health Promotion, 18(1), 38–46. doi: https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-18.1.38
Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2010). Travel and the Built Environment: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(3), 265–294. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944361003766766
Ewing, R. H., & Clemente, O. (2013). Measuring urban design: metrics for livable places. Washington, D.C: Island Press. ISBN:9781610912099
Ewing, R., & Handy, S. (2009). Measuring the Unmeasurable: Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability. Journal of Urban Design, 14(1), 65–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800802451155
Forsyth, A., & Southworth, M. (2008). Cities Afoot—Pedestrians, Walkability and Urban Design. Journal of Urban Design, 13(1), 1–3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800701816896
Foster, S., & Giles-Corti, B. (2008a). The built environment, neighborhood crime and constrained physical activity: An exploration of inconsistent findings. Preventive Medicine, 47(3), 241–251. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.03.017
Foster, S., & Giles-Corti, B. (2008b). The built environment, neighborhood crime and constrained physical activity: An exploration of inconsistent findings. Preventive Medicine, 47(3), 241–251. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.03.017
Frank, L. D. (2005). Multiple Impacts of the Built Environment on Public Health: Walkable Places and the Exposure to Air Pollution. International Regional Science Review, 28(2), 193–216. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017604273853
Frank, Lawrence D., Sallis, J. F., Conway, T. L., Chapman, J. E., Saelens, B. E., & Bachman, W. (2006). Many Pathways from Land Use to Health: Associations between Neighborhood Walkability and Active Transportation, Body Mass Index, and Air Quality. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(1), 75–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360608976725
Gehl, J. (2011). Life between buildings: using public space. Washington, DC: Island Press. Retrieved from http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=3317590. ISBN:9781610910231
Giles-Corti, B., Wood, G., Pikora, T., Learnihan, V., Bulsara, M., Van Niel, K., … Villanueva, K. (2011). School site and the potential to walk to school: The impact of street connectivity and traffic exposure in school neighborhoods. Health & Place, 17(2), 545–550. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.12.011
Glazier, R. H., Creatore, M. I., Weyman, J. T., Fazli, G., Matheson, F. I., Gozdyra, P., … Booth, G. L. (2014). Density, Destinations or Both? A Comparison of Measures of Walkability in Relation to Transportation Behaviors, Obesity and Diabetes in Toronto, Canada. PLoS ONE, 9(1), e85295. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085295
Grasser, G., Van Dyck, D., Titze, S., & Stronegger, W. (2013). Objectively measured walkability and active transport and weight-related outcomes in adults: a systematic review. International Journal of Public Health, 58(4), 615–625. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0435-0
Hajna, S., Dasgupta, K., Halparin, M., & Ross, N. A. (2013). Neighborhood Walkability. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 44(6), 55–59. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2013.01.033
Handy, S. L., Boarnet, M. G., Ewing, R., & Killingsworth, R. E. (2002). How the built environment affects physical activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(2), 64–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00475-0
King, K. E., & Clarke, P. J. (2015). A Disadvantaged Advantage in Walkability: Findings From Socioeconomic and Geographical Analysis of National Built Environment Data in the United States. American Journal of Epidemiology, 181(1), 17–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwu310
Lee, C., & Moudon, A. V. (2006). Correlates of Walking for Transportation or Recreation Purposes. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 3(s1), 77–S98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s77
Lee, I.-M., & Buchner, D. M. (2008). The Importance of Walking to Public Health. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 40(Supplement), 512–518. doi: https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c65d0
Leslie, E., Coffee, N., Frank, L., Owen, N., Bauman, A., & Hugo, G. (2007). Walkability of local communities: Using geographic information systems to objectively assess relevant environmental attributes. Health & Place, 13(1), 111–122. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2005.11.001
Leyden, K. M. (2003). Social Capital and the Built Environment: The Importance of Walkable Neighborhoods. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 1546–1551. doi: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1546
Litman, T. (2003). Economic Value of Walkability. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1828, 3–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.3141/1828-01
Millington, C., Ward Thompson, C., Rowe, D., Aspinall, P., Fitzsimons, C., Nelson, N., & Mutrie, N. (2009). Development of the Scottish Walkability Assessment Tool (SWAT). Health & Place, 15(2), 474–481. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.09.007
Moudon, A. V., & Lee, C. (2003). Walking and Bicycling: An Evaluation of Environmental Audit Instruments. American Journal of Health Promotion, 18(1), 21–37. doi: https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-18.1.21
Panter, J. R., Jones, A. P., Van Sluijs, E. M. F., Griffin, S. J., & Wareham, N. J. (2011). Environmental and Psychological Correlates of Older Adult’s Active Commuting. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 43(7), 1235–1243. doi: https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182078532
Park, S., Deakin, E., & Lee, J. (2014). Perception-Based Walkability Index to Test Impact of Microlevel Walkability on Sustainable Mode Choice Decisions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2464, 126–134. doi: https://doi.org/10.3141/2464-16
Pikora, T. J., Bull, F. C. ., Jamrozik, K., Knuiman, M., Giles-Corti, B., & Donovan, R. J. (2002). Developing a reliable audit instrument to measure the physical environment for physical activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(3), 187–194. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00498-1
Saelens, B. E., Sallis, J. F., & Frank, L. D. (2003a). Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 25(2), 80–91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324796ABM2502_03
Saelens, B. E., Sallis, J. F., & Frank, L. D. (2003b). Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 25(2), 80–91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324796ABM2502_03
Sallis, J. F., Saelens, B. E., Frank, L. D., Conway, T. L., Slymen, D. J., Cain, K. L., … Kerr, J. (2009). Neighborhood built environment and income: Examining multiple health outcomes. Social Science & Medicine, 68(7), 1285–1293. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.01.017
Schlossberg, M., Greene, J., Phillips, P. P., Johnson, B., & Parker, B. (2006). School Trips: Effects of Urban Form and Distance on Travel Mode. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(3), 337–346. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360608976755
Soltani, A., & Askari, S. (2014). Analysis of intra-urban traffic accidents using spatiotemporal visualization techniques. Transport and Telecommunications Journal, 15(3), 227–232. doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/ttj-2014-0020
Soltani, A. (2017). Social and urban form determinants of vehicle ownership; evidence from a developing country. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 96, 90-100, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.12.010
Southworth, M. (2005). Designing the Walkable City. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 131, 246–257. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2005)131:4(246)
Talen, E., & Koschinsky, J. (2013). The Walkable Neighborhood: A Literature Review. International Journal of Sustainable Land Use and Urban Planning, 1(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.24102/ijslup.v1i1.211
Tibbalds, F. (2003). Making people-friendly towns improving the public environment in towns and cities. Taylor & Francis. ISBN-10:0415237599
Witten, K., Blakely, T., Bagheri, N., Badland, H., Ivory, V., Pearce, J., … Schofield, G. (2012). Neighborhood Built Environment and Transport and Leisure Physical Activity: Findings Using Objective Exposure and Outcome Measures in New Zealand. Environmental Health Perspectives, 120(7), 971–977. doi: https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1104584
Copyright (c) 2018 Tema. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following:
1. Authors retain the rights to their work and give in to the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution that allows others to share the work indicating the authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors can adhere to other agreements of non-exclusive license for the distribution of the published version of the work (ex. To deposit it in an institutional repository or to publish it in a monography), provided to indicate that the document was first published in this journal.
3. Authors can distribute their work online (ex. In institutional repositories or in their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and it can increase the quotations of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access)