A GIS-based automated procedure to assess disused areas
Identification methods and regeneration opportunities
Abstract
Regeneration of disused sites represents a significant opportunity. The scientific interest in their redevelopment possibilities has grown considerably in recent years. Despite this, a shared definition of disused sites which goes beyond that of brownfields and allows recognition the size of the problem on a transnational scale is still lacking. This study provides an overview of the main definitions provided by scientific literature and on this basis, it proposes a parametric definition of functionally disused areas. Subsequently, a GIS-based operational tool able to map functionally disused areas through a progressive screening of the local territory is introduced. The proposed methodology is tested on two Italian municipalities. It is the first step of a research aimed at defining a wider process able to assess the possibility of converting disused areas into multifunctional or monofunctional “smart” districts. They could be, indeed, characterized by a mixed use – contributing to soil consumption reduction – or by a single use – “social infrastructures” – linked to the needs that emerged as result of Covid 19 pandemic. This assessment process, hence, could support urban planning both at ordinary and emergency phase, allowing to identify in very short time areas where temporary facilities could be installed.
Downloads
References
Alker, S., Joy, V., Roberts, P., & Smith, N. (2000). The definition of Brownfield. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43 (1), 49-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560010766.
Amanatidis, G. (2020). Note tematiche sull’Unione Europea – 2020, Lotta contro il cambiamento climatico. Retrieved from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/it/sheet/72/lotta-contro-il-cambiamento-climatico.
Angiello, G. (2020). Toward greener and pandemic-proof cities: Italian cities policy responses to Covid-19 pandemic. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 13 (2), 271-280. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/7047.
Bardos, P., Stephenson, I., Menger, P., & Beumer, V. (2015). Maximising the value-proposition for soft reuse of brownfields. AquaConsSoil 2015, Session 2.3 – Redevelopment of Brownfields 1. Retrieved from: http://www.zerobrownfields.eu/HombreMainGallery/Docs/Bardos%20Session%202.3%20ACS%202015%20v2%20Hombre%20web%20site.pdf (accessed on 18 January 2020).
Bartke, S., Martinat, S., Klusáček, P., Pizzol, L., Alexandrescu, F., Frantal, B., Critto, A., & Zabeo, A. (2016). Targeted selection of brownfields from portfolios for sustainable regeneration: User experiences from five cases testing the Timbre Brownfield Prioritization Tool. Journal of Environmental Management, 184 (1), 94-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.037.
Bartke, S., & Shwarze, R. (2015). No perfect tools: Trade-offs of sustainability principles and user requirements in designing support tools for land-use decisions between greenfields and brownfields. Journal of Environmental Management, 153, 11-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.040.
Bauer, A., & Menrad, K. (2019). Standing up for the Paris Agreement: Do global climate targets influence individuals’ greenhouse gas emissions? Environmental Science and Police, 99, 72-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.015.
Chaix, R. (1989). Frinches industrielles et réaffectations en Ile-de-France (Evolution 1995-1988). Hommes et Terres du Nord, 4, 320-324.
Clarinet Project (2002). Brownfields and redevelopment of urban areas. Retrieved from: https://www.commonforum.eu/Documents/DOC/Clarinet/brownfields.pdf.
Coutinho Guimaraes, P.P. (2019). Shopping centres in decline: analysis of demalling in Lisbon. Cities, 87, 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.12.021.
CzechInvest (2008). National Strategy for Brownfields Regeneration of the CzechRepublic. Retrieved from: http://www.czechinvest.org/data/files/strategie-regenerace-vlada-1079.pdf.
Dansero, E., & Spaziante, A. (2016). Scoprire i vuoti industriali: analisi e riflessioni a partire da censimenti e mappature di aree industriali dismesse a Torino. In E. Armano, C.A. Dondona, & F. Ferlaino (Eds.). Postfordismo e trasformazione urbana. Casi di recupero di vuoti industriale e indicazioni per le politiche nel territorio torinese. Torino: Ires Piemonte.
Davis, T.S., & Sherman, S.A. (2010). Brownfields: A Comprehensive Guide to Redeveloping Contaminated Property, Chicago: American Bar Association.
Department of the Environment (1979). Digest of Environmental Pollution Statistics, 3, Hmso, Londra. [14]
Dijkstra, L., & Poelman, H. (2012). Cities in Europe. The new OECD-EC Definition. Retrieved from: htts://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/focus/2012_01_city.pdf.
DoleÏelová, L., Hadlač, M., Kadlecová, M., Martinát, S., & Polednik, M. (2014). Redevelopment potential of brownfields: A-B-C classification and its practical application. Ekonomie, XVII (2), 34-44. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2014-2-003.
Esopi, G. (2018). Urban commons: social resilience experiences to increase the quality of urban system. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 11 (2), 173-194. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/5532.
European Commission (2016). Future brief: No net land take by 2050? Science for Environment Policy, 14. https://doi.org/10.2779/537195. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/research/newsalert/pdf/ no_net_land_take_by_2050_FB14_en.pdf.
European Commission (2011). Mapping Guide for a European Urban Atlas. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/tender/pdf/2012066/annexe2.pdf.
European Commission (2013). Thematic Issue: Brownfield Regeneration. Science for Environment Policy, 39. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/research/newsalert/pdf/39si_en.pdf.
Ferber, U., Grimski, D., Millar, K., & Nathanail, P. (2006). Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration: CABERNET Network Report. Nottingham: University of Nottingham, University Park.
Filpa, A., Lenzi, S., & La Magna, G. (2013). La geografia dell’Italia da riutilizzare. In A. Filpa & S. Lenzi (Eds.). WWF Report: Riutilizziamo l’Italia, dal censimento del dismesso scaturisce un patrimonio di idee per il futuro del Belpaese, 13-28.
Gargiulo, C., & Russo, L. (2017). Cities and Energy Consumption: a Critical Review. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 10 (3), 259-278. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/5182.
Gallagher, R., Liu, Y., & Sigler, T. (2019). Parcel amalgamation as a mechanism for achieving urban consolidation through densification: The fixity of property boundaries over time. Land Use Policy, 89. 104239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104239.
Goldstein, J., Jensen, M., & Reiskin, E. (2001). Urban Vacant Land Redevelopment: Challenges and Progress. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Grafakos, S., Viero, G., Reckien, D., Trigg, K., Viguie, V., Sudmant, A., Graves, C., Foley, A., Heidrich, O., Mirailles, J.M., Carter, J., Chang, L.H., Nador, C., Liseri, M., Chelleri, L., Orru, H., Orru, K., Aelenei, R., …, & Dawson, R. (2020). Integration of mitigation and adaptation in urban climate change action plans in Europe: A systematic assessment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 121, 109623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109623.
Grassi, A. (1989). Un caso di politica e gestione territoriale: les grandes frinches industrielle in Francia. In La città Europea. Nuove città e vecchi luoghi di lavoro. Bologna: Ente Autonomo Fiere di Bologna.
Hou, D., Gu, Q., Ma, F., & O'Connell, S. (2016). Life cycle assessment comparison of thermal desorption and stabilization/solidification of mercury contaminated soil on agricultural land. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 949-956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.108.
Hou, D., Song, Y., Zhang, J., Hou, M., O'Connor, D., & Harclerode, M. (2018). Climate change mitigation potential of contaminated land redevelopment: A city-level assessment method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 1396-1406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.071.
Istituto nazionale di statistica (Istat) (2017). Forme, livelli e dinamiche dell’urbanizzazione in Italia. Roma: ISTAT.
Istituto nazionale di statistica (Istat) (2013). Statistiche report - La superficie dei comuni, delle province e delle regioni italiane. Retrieved from: https://www.istat.it/it/files//2013/02/Superfici-dei-comuni.pdf.
Johnson, M.P., Hollander, J., & Hallulli, A. (2014). Maintain, demolish, re-purpose: Policy design for vacant land management using decision models. Cities, 40 (B), 151-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.05.005.
Kim, G., Miller, P.A., & Nowak, D.J. (2018). Urban vacant land typology: A tool for managing urban vacant land. Sustainable Cities and Society, 36, 144-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.09.014.
Krzysztofik, R., Kantor-Pietraga, I., & Spòrna, T. (2013). A dynamic approach to the typology of functional derelict areas (Sosnowiec, Poland). Moravian Geographical Reports, 21 (2), 20-34. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2013-0008.
Laprise, M., Lufkin, S., & Rey, E. (2015). An indicator system for the assessment of sustainability integrated into the project dynamics of regeneration of disused urban areas. Building and Environment, 86, 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.12.002.
Li, X., Bardos, P., Cundy, A.B., Harder, M.K., Doick, K.J., Norrman, J., Williams, S., & Chen, W. (2019). Using a conceptual site model for assessing the sustainability of brownfield regeneration for a soft reuse: A case study of Port Sunlight River Park (U.K.). Science of The Total Environment, 652, 810-821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.278.
Loo, B.P.Y., Cheng, A.H.T., & Nichols, S.L. (2017). Transit-oriented development on greenfield versus infill sites: Some lessons from Hong Kong. Landscape and Urban Planning, 167, 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.05.013.
Loures, L., Panagopoulos, T., & Burley, J.B. (2016). Assessing user preferences on post-industrial redevelopment. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 43 (5), 871-892. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813515599981.
Loures, L., & Vaz, E. (2018). Exploring expert perception towards brownfield redevelopment benefits according to their typology. Habitat International, 72, 66-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.11.003.
Martinat, S., Navratil, J., Hollander, J.B., Trojan, J., Klapka, P., Klusacek, P., & Kalok, D. (2018). Re-reuse of regenerated brownfields: Lessons from an Eastern European post-industrial city. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 536-545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.313.
Meyer, D., & Riechert, M. (2019). Open source QGIS toolkit for the Advanced Research WFR modelling system. Environmental Modelling & Software, 112, 166-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.10.018.
Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti (2018). Aggiornamento delle «Norme tecniche per le costruzioni». S.O. alla GURI n. 42, 20 febbraio 2018.
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (2019). National Planning Policy Framework, UK: APS Group.
Morano, P., & Tajani, F. (2018). Saving soil and financial feasibility. A model to support public-private partnerships in the regeneration of abandoned areas. Land Use Policy, 73, 40-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.036.
Munafo, M., & Tombolini, I. (2014). Il consumo di suolo in Italia. Rapporti ISPRA, 195. Roma: ISPRA. [45]
Municipality of Rende (1971). Technical Implementation Norms of the General Regulatory Plan, artt. 27.8, 29. Draft.
Network for Industrially Contaminated Land in Europe (NICOLE) (2002). Need for Sustainable Land Management: Role of a Risk Assessment Based Approach. Utrecht.
Newton, P. (2010). Beyond Greenfield and Brownfield: the challenge of regenerating Australia’s greyfield suburbs. Built Environment, 36 (1), 81-104. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.36.1.81.
Newton, P., Murray, S., Wakefield, R., Murphy, C., Khor, L., & Morgan, T. (2011). Towards a New Development Model for Housing Regeneration in Greyfield Residential Precincts. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute, Swinburne-Monash Research Centre.
Newton, P., Newman, P., Glackin, S., & Trubka, R. (2012). Greening the Greyfields: Unloking the Redevelopment Potential of the Middle Suburbs in Australian Cities. Engineering and Technology, 71, 138-157.
Paolella, A. (2013). RiutilizziAmo l’Italia: un grande progetto culturale e di partecipazione attiva. In A. Filpa & S. Lenzi (Eds.). WWF Report: Riutilizziamo l’Italia, dal censimento del dismesso scaturisce un patrimonio di idee per il futuro del Belpaese, 7-12. WWF.
Papa, R. (2018). Editorial Preface: TeMA Journal of Land Use Mobility and Environment 2 (2018). TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 11 (2), 171-172. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/5785.
Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (POST) (1988). A brown and pleasant land. London: POST.
Punziano, G., & Terracciano, A. (2017). Urban Voids: renewal and regeneration experiences in Naples. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 10 (3), 299-323. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/5171.
Regione Lombardia (2010). Schede di censimento delle aree dismesse del territorio lombardo. Retrieved from: https://www.regione.lombardia.it/wps/wcm/connect/3c658210-6a4b-4d90-9970-6ec2c059f94d/Como+-+Aree+dismesse.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=ROOTWORKSPACE-3c658210-6a4b-4d90-9970-6ec2c059f94d-lP4S6Ly.
Regione Lombardia (2014). Strumenti per il censimento delle aree dismesse. Retrieved from: https://www.regione.lombardia.it/wps/portal/istituzionale/HP/DettaglioPubblicazione/servizi-e-informazioni/Enti-e-Operatori/territorio/sistema-informativo-territoriale-sit/aree-dismesse/aree-dismesse.
Salvati, L., & Lamonica, G.R. (2020). Containing urban expansion: Densification vs greenfield development, socio-demographic transformations and the economic crisis in a Southern European City, 2006–2015. Ecological Indicators, 110, 105923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105923.
Salvati, L., Sateriano, A., & Grigoriadis, E. (2016). Crisis and the city: profiling urban growth under economic expansion and stagnation. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 9 (3), 329-342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12076-015-0160-4.
Sobel, L.S., Greenberg, E. & Bodzin, S. (2002). Greyfields Into Goldfields: Dead Malls Become Living Neighborhoods. San Francisco: Congress for the New Urbanism.
Song, Y., Kirkwood, N., Maksimović, Č., Zheng, X., O'Connor, D., Jin, Y., & Hou, D. (2019). Nature based solutions for contaminated land remediation and brownfield redevelopment in cities: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 663, 568-579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.347.
Tang, X., Shen, H., Chen, M., Yang, X., Yang, D., Wang, F., Chen, Z., Liu, X., Wang, H., & Xu, J. (2020). Achieving the safe use of Cd- and As-contaminated agricultural land with an Fe-based biochar: A field study. Science of the Total Environment, 706. 135898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135898.
Taylor, M.P., & Lewin, J. (1966). River behavior and Holocene Alluviation: The River Severn at Welshpool, mid-Wales, UK. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 21 (1), 77-91. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9837(199601)21:1<77::AID-ESP547>3.0.CO;2-O.
Turk, S.S., & Korthals Altes, W.K. (2010). Institutional capacities in the land development for housing on greenfield sites in Istanbul. Habitat International, 34 (2), 183-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.09.002.
UN General Assembly (2016). New Urban Agenda – Quito Declaration on Sustainable Cities and Human Settlements for All. Retrieved from: https://habitat3.org/the-new-urban-agenda.
United Nations (2018). World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision. Retrieved from: https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2018-KeyFacts.pdf.
Voronina, A.V., Blinova, M.O., Semenishchev, V.S., & Gupta, D.K. (2015). Returning land contaminated as a result of radiation accidents to farming use. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 144, 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.03.012.
Zucaro, F., & Morosini, R. (2018). Sustainable land use and climate adaptation: a review of European local plans. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 11 (1), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/5343.
Copyright (c) 2020 TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following:
1. Authors retain the rights to their work and give in to the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution that allows others to share the work indicating the authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors can adhere to other agreements of non-exclusive license for the distribution of the published version of the work (ex. To deposit it in an institutional repository or to publish it in a monography), provided to indicate that the document was first published in this journal.
3. Authors can distribute their work online (ex. In institutional repositories or in their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and it can increase the quotations of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access)