Emergency and spatial planning towards cooperative approaches

Challenges and opportunities in the multi-risk area of Campi Flegrei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/7417
Keywords: emergency planning, spatial planning, multi-risk areas

Abstract

The dependency of risk scenarios on the dynamics of urban transformation clearly highlights the need of ensuring a closer cooperation between spatial and emergency planning processes. So far the relationships between these processes have been rather limited, leading at most to the transposition of the emergency plans' indications in the spatial plans. Nevertheless, more cooperative approaches would be crucial to increase safety, resilience and sustainability of human settlements, above all when the latter are threatened by different hazard factors. In order to explore barriers and opportunities for a better cooperation between emergency and spatial planning tools, this contribution will focus on the Campi Flegrei in the Campania Region (Southern Italy): an area densely populated, hosting a significant historical, cultural, and natural heritage, and prone to volcanic, seismic and hydrogeological hazards. The case study area is also characteized by the coexistence of emergency and spatial planning tools acting on different spatial scales, developed by different actors and not always fully consistent each other. In detail, based on the in-depth analysis of the location and accessibility of emergency facilities, crucial to guarantee an effective response in the aftermath of hazardous events, we will here highlight both the main criticalities of the emergency plans recently carried out for the selected Municipalities and the difficulties and opportunities related to a better integration between spatial and emergency planning at municipal scale.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Adriana Galderisi, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli - Department of Architecture and Industrial Design

She is Associate Professor at the Department of Architecture and Industrial Design of the University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli. PhD in Territorial and Urban Planning. Since 2000, her research activities have been focused on vulnerability of urban systems to environmental risks within national and European projects. She is Author of more than 120 scientific contributions including both articles published in national and international journals and chapters in books.

Giuseppe Guida, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli - Department of Architecture and Industrial Design

He is PhD in Territorial and Urban Planning and currently fixed-term Researcher in Urban Planning at the University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Department of Architecture and Industrial Design, where he teaches Urban Planning. His research activities are mostly focused on metropolitan areas, periurban and landscape urbanism. On these issues he is author of numerous books, scientific articles and chapter in books.

Giada Limongi, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli - Department of Architecture and Industrial Design

She is PhD student in Architecture, Industrial Design and Cultural Heritage at the University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli. Master’s degree in engineering with a thesis on the interconnection between environmental degradation, territorial risks and climate change in metropolitan areas. Ongoing PhD research is framed into the fields of sustainability, disaster resilience and smart cities. 

References

Alexander, D. (2015). Disaster and Emergency Planning for Preparedness, Response, and Recovery. Natural Hazard Sciences. Oxford Research Encyclopedias. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389407.013.12.

Bacci, M. & Di Marco, M. (eds.). Il Rischio Sismico in Toscana. Valutazione del rischio sismico in Toscana. Livello sintetico a scala comunale e urbana. Livello 1 e 2. Settore Sismica - Prevenzione Sismica Regione Toscana, September 2019.

Bruneau, M., Chang, S.E., Eguchi, R. T., Lee, G. C., O’Rourke, T. D., Reinhorn, A. M., Shinozuka, M., Tierney, K., Wallace, W. A. & von Winterfeldt, D. (2003). A Framework to Quantitatively Assess and Enhance the Seismic Resilience of Communities. Earthquake Spectra, 19(4), 733–752. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1623497

Cacace, F., Zuccaro, G., De Gregorio, D. & Perelli, F. L. (2018). Building inventory at national scale by evaluation of seismic vulnerability classes distribution based on census data analysis: BINC procedure. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 28, 384-393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.03.016

Christoplos, I., Mitchell, J. & Liljelund, A. (2001), Re-framing Risk: The Changing Context of Disaster Mitigation and Preparedness. Disasters, 25(3), 185–198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-7717.00171.

Curci, F. (2020). Natural Risks Exposure and Hazard Avoidance Strategies: Learning from Vesuvius. In A. Balducci, D. Chiffi & F. Curci (Eds.). Risk and Resilience. Socio-Spatial and Environmental Challenges, 95-112, Switzerland: Springer Brief. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56067-6

Di Lodovico, L. & Di Ludovico, D. (2018). Limit Condition for the Intermunicipal Emergency. Tema. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 11(3), 305-322. http://dx.doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/5845

Djalante, R. (2012). Adaptive governance and resilience: the role of multi-stakeholder platforms in disaster risk reduction Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 2923–2942. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-2923-2012

FEMA (2010). Developing and Maintaining Emergency Operations Plans. Comprehensive Preparedness Guide (CPG) 101. Version 2.0. November 2010. Retrieved from: https://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/25975

FEMA (2011). A whole community approach to emergency management: principles, themes and pathways for action. FDOC 104-008-1. Retrieved from: https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1813-25045-0649/wholecommunity_ dec2011__2_.pdf

Francini, M., Artese, S., Gaudio, S., Palermo, A. & Vipiana, M. F. (2018a). To support urban emergency planning: A GIS instrument for the choice of optimal routes based on seismic hazards. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 31, 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.04.020

Francini, M., Gaudio, S., Palermo, A. & Viapiana, M. F. (2018b). Pianificare la resilienza urbana mediante i Piani di emergenza di Protezione civile. Territorio, 85, 125-133. https://doi.org/10.3280/tr2018-085015

Galderisi, A. (2020). La pianificazione di Emergenza in Italia: criticità, innovazioni e potenziali sinergie con la pianificazione urbanistica. In M. Francini, A. Palermo & M.F. Viapiana (Eds.). Il Piano di Emergenza nell’uso e nella gestione del territorio, 113-123, Milano: Franco Angeli.

Lindell, M. K. (2013). Emergency Management. In: P. Bobrowsky (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Natural Hazards, 263-271, Dordrecht: Springer.

Lindell, M. K. & Perry, R. W. (2007). Planning and Preparedness. In K. J. Tierney & W. F. Waugh (Eds.). Emergency Management: Principles and Practice for Local Government, 2nd Edition, 113-141. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.

Macedonio, G. Martini, M., Neri, A., Papale, P., Rosi, M., Zuccaro, G. & Cardaci, C. (2012). Rapporto Finale. Retrieved from: http://www.protezionecivile.gov.it/delegate/JapsPdfResource?pdfName= rapporto_GdL_ CampiFlegrei_art_70_def.pdf

Manicardi, A., Ricci, L. & Romani, M. (2014). Coordinamento delle Analisi della Condizione Limite per l’emergenza. Rapporto tra Pianificazione d’Emergenza Provinciale, Comunale e Pianificazione Territoriale e Urbanistica nell’Esperienza della Provincia di Modena. Atti 33 GNSTS, Bologna.

Markolf, S. A., Hoehne, C., Fraser, A., Chester, M. V. & Underwood, B. S. (2019). Transportation resilience to climate change and extreme weather events. Beyond risk and robustness. Transport Policy, 74, 174-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.11.003

Menoni, S. (2013). Emergency planning. In P. Bobrowsky (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Natural Hazards, 273-261, Dordrecht: Springer.

Moccia, F. D. (2018). Lo stato dell’urbanistica in Campania. Milano: Franco Angeli.

Papa, R., Galderisi, A., Vigo Majello M.C. & Saretta E. (2015). Smart and resilient cities. A systemic approach for developing cross-sectoral strategies in the face of climate change. Tema. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 8 (1), 19-49. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/2883

Perry, R.W. & Lindell, M. (2003). Preparedness for emergency response: guidelines for the emergency planning process. Disasters, 27-4: 336-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0361-3666.2003.00237.x.

Regione Puglia (2019). Linee Guida per la Redazione dei Piani di Protezione Civile Comunali. Deliberazione della Giunta Regionale 30 luglio 2019, n. 1414. Bollettino Ufficiale della Regione Puglia - n. 97 del 27-8-2019. Retrieved from: http://www.protezionecivile.puglia.it/archives/23329

Ricci, T., Barberi, F., Davis, M.S., Isaia, R. & Nave, R. (2013). Volcanic risk perception in the Campi Flegrei area. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 254, 118-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2013.01.002

Tilio, L., Murgante, B., Di Trani, F., Vona, M. & Masi, A. (2012). Mitigation of urban vulnerability through a spatial multicriteria approach. Disaster Advances, 5 (3), 138-143.

Published
2021-06-30
How to Cite
GalderisiA., GuidaG., & LimongiG. (2021). Emergency and spatial planning towards cooperative approaches. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 73-92. https://doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/7417
Issue
2021: Special Issue. The emergency plan for the use and management of the territory
Section
The Emergency Plan for the use and management of the territory

Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following:

1. Authors retain the rights to their work and give in to the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License - Attribution that allows others to share the work indicating the authorship and the initial publication in this journal.

 

2. Authors can adhere to other agreements of non-exclusive license for the distribution of the published version of the work (ex. To deposit it in an institutional repository or to publish it in a monography), provided to indicate that the document was first published in this journal.


3. Authors can distribute their work online (ex. In institutional repositories or in their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and it can increase the quotations of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access)