Illusion and Error. The Dogma of Intuition and the Phenomenological Adventures of Max Scheler
Abstract
This essay examines some of the main aspects of Max Scheler’s conception of phenomenology, starting from some of the early writings previous to the Formalismusbuch in which he analyzes the theme of self-deception and the idols of Self-Knowledge. Scheler, to whom Husserl’s transcendental phenomenology had no meaning, attacked the self-evidence of inner perception on a much larger scale. For him, inner perception, or more specifically self-perception, was as susceptible to illusion as external knowledge; in fact, Scheler thought it to be even more exposed to such risk. In an attempt to demonstrate this, Scheler went back to Bacon’s general doctrine of the idols with an investigation of the sources of illusions in the field of self-knowledge. In this essay I move from an analysis of the peculiar version of Scheler’s phenomenology and of its attitude – through which we enter into an immediate intuitive relationship with things, so that phenomenological facts or “whatness” are always fully given and are now beyond the range of all possible illusions, in order to contrast it with the Husserlian doctrine of perceptual illusion, developed in the context of the genealogy of logic and with reference to the theme of transcendent perception and of antepredicative experience.
Downloads
The author retains the copyright of his work whilst granting anyone the possibility “to reproduce, distribute, publicly communicate, publicly exhibit, display, perform and recite the work”, provided that the author and the title of the journal are cited correctly. When submitting the text for publication the author is furthermore required to declare that the contents and the structure of the work are original and that it does not by any means compromise the rights of third parties nor the obligations connected to the safeguard of the moral and economic rights of other authors or other right holders, both for texts, images, photographs, tables, as well as for other parts which compose the contribution. The author furthermore declares that he/she is conscious of the sanctions prescribed by the penal code and by the Italian Criminal and Special Laws for false documents and the use false documents, and that therefore Bollettino Filosofico is not liable to responsibilities of any nature, civil, administrative or penal, and that the author agrees to indemnify and hold Bollettino Filosofico harmless from all requests and claims by third parties.