Is Russian Philosophy a Philosophy of the Other to the West?
Abstract
The paper articulates ideas of Nikolai Berdyaev expressed in his book The Russian Idea and wonders if it is the case that, “The fate of the philosopher in Russia is painful and tragic”. If we think of Socrates, for example, his death was painful and in the end tragic. So, how is it the fate of the philosopher in Russia different from other philosophical traditions? Maybe the answer is that we can grasp Russian philosophy's otherness only by non-intellectual and non-theoretical rationality, which is not rooted in the mind but in the heart. As one of the Russian poets, Fyodor Tyutchev said, “Russia is not to be understood by intellectual processes. You cannot take her measurements with a common yardstick, she has a form and stature of her own: you can only believe in Russia”. Thus, the paper explores why Russian philosophy is the other and can be understood only within its connection within its cultural and historical background.
Keywords: Russian Philosophy, Russian Idea, Ontologism, Sobornost, All-Unity
Downloads
The author retains the copyright of his work whilst granting anyone the possibility “to reproduce, distribute, publicly communicate, publicly exhibit, display, perform and recite the work”, provided that the author and the title of the journal are cited correctly. When submitting the text for publication the author is furthermore required to declare that the contents and the structure of the work are original and that it does not by any means compromise the rights of third parties nor the obligations connected to the safeguard of the moral and economic rights of other authors or other right holders, both for texts, images, photographs, tables, as well as for other parts which compose the contribution. The author furthermore declares that he/she is conscious of the sanctions prescribed by the penal code and by the Italian Criminal and Special Laws for false documents and the use false documents, and that therefore Bollettino Filosofico is not liable to responsibilities of any nature, civil, administrative or penal, and that the author agrees to indemnify and hold Bollettino Filosofico harmless from all requests and claims by third parties.